Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AACE International Exam AACE-PSP Topic 4 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for AACE International's AACE-PSP exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 4
[All AACE-PSP Questions]

How could the structural steel drawing delay have been prevented?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Malcom
4 months ago
Option A? Time buffer? Sounds like someone's trying to add more time to their vacation. Let's stick to the basics, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
4 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with B. It's the safest option, and you can't go wrong with good old-fashioned planning.
upvoted 0 times
Lynette
3 months ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
4 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
4 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martina
4 months ago
D? Really? Switching to post-tensioned concrete? That's overkill, just plan for the review process properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
4 months ago
C seems like a risky move. You don't want to start fabrication before the drawings are approved, that's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
Brock
4 months ago
D) Switching to post-tensioned concrete construction could be a drastic change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
4 months ago
C) I agree, releasing the structural steel for fabrication before approval is risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
4 months ago
B) Allow adequate time for review and resubmittal in the baseline schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
4 months ago
A) Add a time buffer at the end of structural steel activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
5 months ago
Switching to post-tensioned concrete construction might have been a drastic but effective solution to prevent delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Allowing enough time for review and resubmittal is crucial to avoid delays.
upvoted 0 times
Asuncion
4 months ago
I think adding a time buffer at the end of structural steel activities could also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
4 months ago
I agree, option B is definitely important to prevent delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maile
5 months ago
I believe releasing the structural steel for fabrication concurrent with review could have also prevented the delay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
5 months ago
I agree with Rusty, having some extra time at the end would have helped.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
5 months ago
I think adding a time buffer at the end could have prevented the delay.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77