Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACFE Exam CFE-Investigation Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Investigation exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 2
[All CFE-Investigation Questions]

Which of the following is the MOST ACCURATE statement regarding the analysis phase in digital forensic investigations?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cyril
3 months ago
That's true, but I still think option B is the best approach for analysis phase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
3 months ago
I bet the person who wrote Option A has never actually done a real forensic investigation before. You can't just sit on your hands until you 'verify' there's no relevant data. That's not how it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
3 months ago
Haha, Option C is like saying 'look for the truth, but ignore anything that might prove innocence.' Sounds like a recipe for a biased investigation if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
3 months ago
Yeah, I think option B is the most accurate. Using a combination of tools can help ensure a thorough analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
3 months ago
I agree, option C doesn't make sense. We should consider all evidence, not just what fits our preconceived notions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pura
3 months ago
Option D is just plain silly. The whole point is to collect and preserve the evidence, not protect it from being seized. What kind of forensic investigator would do that?
upvoted 0 times
Tess
2 months ago
C) When analyzing data for evidence, fraud examiners should look for exculpatory evidence but not exculpatory evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
3 months ago
B) During the analysis phase, it is best to use a combination of the various forensic tools that can assist in identifying, extracting, and collecting digital evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
3 months ago
A) The analysis phase of digital forensic investigations should not commence unless it is verified that the suspect devices do not contain relevant data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Donte
3 months ago
But what about option A? Verifying suspect devices first seems important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
4 months ago
I'm not sure about Option C - shouldn't we be looking for both incriminating and exculpatory evidence? That seems like a key part of a fair investigation.
upvoted 0 times
Regenia
3 months ago
D) The primary concern when analyzing digital evidence is to protect the collected information from seizure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
3 months ago
C) When analyzing data for evidence, fraud examiners should look for incriminating evidence as well as exculpatory evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
3 months ago
B) During the analysis phase, it is best to use a combination of the various forensic tools that can assist in identifying, extracting, and collecting digital evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
3 months ago
A) The analysis phase of digital forensic investigations should not commence unless it is verified that the suspect devices do not contain relevant data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helene
4 months ago
Option B seems like the best approach. Using a variety of forensic tools can really help ensure we don't miss any important evidence.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
4 months ago
Definitely, it's important to be thorough during the analysis phase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
4 months ago
I agree, using multiple forensic tools can help us gather all the evidence we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marla
4 months ago
I agree with Cyril, using a combination of forensic tools is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
4 months ago
I think the most accurate statement is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77