Adobe Exam AD0-E121 Topic 6 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E121 exam

Question #: 66
Topic #: 6

A customer has been using the AEM ContextHub feature Cut wants to extend it by adding an additional API. The additional API will be used to allow digital marketers to target banners based on CRM data for the current visit.

What should the Business Practitioner recommend that the customer create?

AA ContextHub Ul module

BA custom session store candidate

CA custom persisted store candidate

DA custom ISONP store candidate

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Mayra at Aug 26, 2024, 07:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E121 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Trina

3 months ago

C is the way to go, no doubt about it. The customer wants to target banners based on CRM data, and a custom persisted store is perfect for that. Easy peasy lemon squeezy!

upvoted 0 times

Filiberto

1 months ago

I see, but a custom persisted store would provide better functionality for targeting banners based on CRM data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alex

1 months ago

B) A custom session store candidate

upvoted 0 times

...

Carrol

1 months ago

Actually, a custom persisted store would be more suitable for this specific requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

2 months ago

A) A ContextHub UI module

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherita

2 months ago

That makes sense, a custom persisted store would indeed be the best choice for targeting banners based on CRM data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuette

2 months ago

C) A custom persisted store candidate

upvoted 0 times

...

Marsha

3 months ago

I think a ContextHub UI module might be a good choice too, as it could provide a user-friendly interface for managing the additional API.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

3 months ago

I believe a custom session store candidate could also work well in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

3 months ago

I agree with Roselle, a custom persisted store candidate would be the best option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leandro

3 months ago

D, definitely D! ISONP is the way to go, it's like the Fonzie of store candidates - cool, confident, and gets the job done.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alisha

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. B or C could both work, but I'm leaning towards C since we want to persist the CRM data across sessions.

upvoted 0 times

Steffanie

2 months ago

I agree, C would be the most suitable choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thurman

2 months ago

Agreed, C would be the most suitable choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

3 months ago

I think C is the best option for persisting the CRM data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brianne

3 months ago

I think C is the best option for persisting the CRM data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roselle

3 months ago

I think the Business Practitioner should recommend creating a custom persisted store candidate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edda

3 months ago

I think the answer is C. A custom persisted store candidate seems like the best option to extend the ContextHub functionality and integrate CRM data.

upvoted 0 times

Nida

3 months ago

C: Yes, a custom persisted store candidate would allow digital marketers to target banners based on CRM data for the current visit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candra

3 months ago

B: I agree, a custom persisted store candidate would be the most suitable choice for adding the additional API.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gayla

3 months ago

A: I think the answer is C. A custom persisted store candidate seems like the best option to extend the ContextHub functionality and integrate CRM data.

upvoted 0 times

...