Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E134 Topic 2 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E134 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 2
[All AD0-E134 Questions]

A client has asked to share an HTML version of test coverage report for the AEM project.

What plugin should the AEM developer use to generate test coverage report using latest archetype?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To generate a test coverage report for an AEM project using the latest archetype, the correct plugin to use is the maven-surefire-plugin (Option A). The maven-surefire-plugin is a part of the Maven ecosystem and is widely used to run unit tests within a Maven project. This plugin can be configured to generate detailed test reports, including HTML versions, which can be easily shared with clients.

Here's how to configure the maven-surefire-plugin to generate test coverage reports:

Add the Plugin to the POM File: Add the maven-surefire-plugin configuration in your pom.xml file:

<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>

maven-surefire-plugin

<version>2.22.2</version>

<configuration>

<reportsDirectory>${project.build.directory}/surefire-reports</reportsDirectory>

<reportFormat>html</reportFormat>

<trimStackTrace>false</trimStackTrace>

</configuration>

Execute the Maven Command: Run the following command to execute the tests and generate the coverage report:

mvn clean test

Locate the Report: The HTML test coverage report will be generated in the target/surefire-reports directory of your project.


Maven Surefire Plugin Documentation

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lyda
2 months ago
Option B looks like it was designed by a toddler. Seriously, who thought that color scheme was a good idea?
upvoted 0 times
Lavera
20 days ago
I wonder why they chose that design for Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
21 days ago
Yeah, the color scheme is definitely not appealing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
2 months ago
I agree, Option B does look pretty bad.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latia
2 months ago
I dunno, man. This whole test coverage thing sounds like a real headache. Can we just tell the client we lost the data and start fresh?
upvoted 0 times
Augustine
2 months ago
Howard: Good idea, let's go with option C and get this test coverage report sorted out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
2 months ago
I agree, we can't avoid it. Let's look into using the plugin mentioned in option C to generate the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
2 months ago
No way, we can't just tell the client we lost the data. We need to figure out how to generate that test coverage report.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wade
2 months ago
Why do you think Option B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
2 months ago
Option C all the way, baby! Simplicity is the name of the game. The client will appreciate the no-frills approach.
upvoted 0 times
Lavonda
1 months ago
Let's go with Option C then. It's the best choice for generating the test coverage report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
2 months ago
I've used Option C before and it worked like a charm. The client will be happy with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
2 months ago
Yeah, I think the client will appreciate the straightforward approach of Option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
2 months ago
I agree, Option C is definitely the way to go. It's simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lasandra
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option B is the best plugin for generating test coverage report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
2 months ago
B is just too cluttered, I can't imagine the client would be happy with that. C is too basic, we need something with a bit more pizzazz, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Mose
2 months ago
Agreed, A it is then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
2 months ago
Let's go with A, it has a nice balance of information and design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
2 months ago
C) Option C
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
2 months ago
A) Option A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wade
3 months ago
I think the AEM developer should use Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
3 months ago
Option A looks like the way to go. It's got a nice clean interface, perfect for generating that HTML report.
upvoted 0 times
Ammie
2 months ago
Yeah, Option A looks user-friendly and efficient for the task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
2 months ago
I agree, Option A seems like the best choice for generating the HTML report.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77