Adobe Exam AD0-E134 Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E134 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Johnna

5 months ago

Interesting perspective, Hester. It's helpful to consider all aspects of the tool's scope while preparing for the exam.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hester

6 months ago

I personally believe that option C is out of scope. Definitions of Oak indices for compatibility don't seem relevant to the Pattern Detector tool during an AEM upgrade.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

6 months ago

That's a good point, Laila. rep:User nodes compatibility might be out of scope for the tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laila

6 months ago

For me, it's option D. rep:User nodes compatibility in the context of OAuth configuration seems irrelevant to the Pattern Detector tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnna

6 months ago

I agree with Fernanda, option B. Backward compatibility with the previous version should not be considered while using the Pattern Detector tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

7 months ago

I think Out of Scope for the Pattern Detector tool during an AEM upgrade is backward compatibility with the previous version.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

7 months ago

I agree with Aileen. rep:User nodes compatibility is not within the scope of the Pattern Detector tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

7 months ago

I believe option D is the correct answer. OAuth configuration compatibility is not relevant for the tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

7 months ago

I disagree with Cristal. Backward compatibility is crucial for seamless transition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristal

7 months ago

I think option B is out of scope. Backward compatibility shouldn't be a concern during an upgrade.

upvoted 0 times

...