Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E207 Topic 2 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E207 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 2
[All AD0-E207 Questions]

A coworker creates the calculated metric named "Orders / Visits" in Adobe Analytics to determine the percentage of visits that purchased something on the company's website.

The coworker includes the calculated metric in the Products report. The coworker notices that the sum of the orders for the products is greater than the total orders shown in the report.

What should the Architect do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The issue arises because the calculated metric 'Orders / Visits' is not aggregating correctly at the product level in the Products report. To resolve this, the Architect should create a calculated metric that uses the Total versions of the Orders and Visits metrics. This ensures that the calculation is performed on the overall totals rather than individual line items, providing an accurate percentage of visits that resulted in purchases.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Wilburn
26 days ago
I believe putting Orders and Visits into a new event using Processing Rules could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
1 months ago
I agree with Margot, creating a Data Source seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
1 months ago
Ah, the joys of Adobe Analytics! I bet the coworker forgot to carry the one or something. D is the way to go, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
Cristy
22 hours ago
Definitely, that should help reconcile the sum of orders with the total orders shown in the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
7 days ago
Yeah, creating a calculated metric that includes the Total versions of the metrics should fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
25 days ago
I think D is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margot
1 months ago
I think the Architect should create a Data Source to upload the totals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
1 months ago
Okay, this is a head-scratcher. I'm gonna go with D and hope the Architect can work their magic to untangle this mess.
upvoted 0 times
Rhea
29 days ago
Yeah, let's trust the Architect to fix this with a calculated metric that covers all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
1 months ago
I think D is the way to go, including the Total versions might solve the discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jenise
2 months ago
Woah, the sum of orders is greater than the total orders? That's gotta be a glitch in the system. I'd go with D to get the accurate totals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
2 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I think the calculated metric is messing up the data, so D seems like the best option to fix it.
upvoted 0 times
Tori
19 days ago
I think either D or A could work, but D might be more comprehensive in addressing the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
20 days ago
That's a good point, it could potentially solve the discrepancy in the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
21 days ago
But wouldn't creating a new classification and uploading the SAINT file also help in fixing the issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
29 days ago
That sounds like a good solution. It should provide a more accurate representation of the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
30 days ago
I agree, D seems like the best option to include the Total versions of the metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
1 months ago
I agree, creating a calculated metric that includes Total versions of the metrics should help reconcile the discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77