Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E213 Topic 9 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E213 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 9
[All AD0-E213 Questions]

An analyst intended to prevent the next tracking call from being sent to Adobe; however, after reviewing the reports, she found that the tracking call was still sent to Adobe. Which code should the analyst have added to the doPlugins() function?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Merilyn
2 months ago
A for sure! Abort that tracking call and save the day. Although, I do wonder if there's a hidden option to just send it to Adobe's competitor instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe B or D? Disabling the tracking seems tricky.
upvoted 0 times
Julio
6 days ago
Let's consult the documentation to see the recommended approach for handling tracking calls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
7 days ago
Maybe we should test both options to see which one works best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
8 days ago
I disagree, I believe D is the correct option. Enabling the tracking call would have prevented the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
11 days ago
I think B is the right choice. Disabling the tracking call might have caused the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
23 days ago
Maybe the analyst should have added s.abort = true to the doPlugins() function to prevent the tracking call from being sent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
28 days ago
I believe D is the right choice. Enabling the tracking call could have prevented the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 months ago
I think B is the correct option. Disabling the tracking call might have caused the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alva
2 months ago
C looks good to me. Setting s.track to false should stop the tracking call, right?
upvoted 0 times
Precious
1 months ago
C) s.track = false;
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
1 months ago
B) s.abort = false;
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
1 months ago
That's a good point, maybe both options could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
2 months ago
A) s.abort = true;
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
2 months ago
But wouldn't setting s.abort to true also stop the tracking call?
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
2 months ago
I agree, setting s.track to false should prevent the tracking call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
2 months ago
I think C is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawn
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think both options A) and D) could potentially work depending on the specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D) s.track = true would have been the correct code to prevent the tracking call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
3 months ago
I think the analyst should have added option A) s.abort = true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
3 months ago
I think the answer is A. Aborting the tracking call seems like the right way to prevent it from being sent to Adobe.
upvoted 0 times
Janet
2 months ago
I agree with Jettie, A seems like the most logical choice to prevent the tracking call from being sent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
2 months ago
I think it's D. Enabling s.track to true might be the solution to prevent the tracking call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe it's B. Setting s.abort to false could also prevent the tracking call.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
2 months ago
I think the answer is A. Aborting the tracking call seems like the right way to prevent it from being sent to Adobe.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77