Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E307 Topic 3 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E307 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 3
[All AD0-E307 Questions]

The sent count is less than the upstream population. What are two reasons for this result? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jannette
2 months ago
Option B and D, for sure. Whoever thought up those pressure typologies and had an upstream population that was way too large should be sent to quarantine themselves!
upvoted 0 times
Xochitl
1 months ago
We should make sure to avoid those mistakes in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
1 months ago
Yeah, and having such a large upstream population definitely didn't help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
2 months ago
I agree, those pressure typologies really affected the sent count.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgina
2 months ago
I disagree. I believe the answer is B) Some pressure typologies were applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
2 months ago
I agree with Lewis. I also think the answer is C) Some recipients were quarantined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) The upstream population did NOT include seeds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
3 months ago
Ha! I'm going with A and C. No seeds in the upstream population and some recipients were in quarantine - talk about a recipe for a low sent count!
upvoted 0 times
Sunshine
2 months ago
It makes sense, without seeds and with recipients in quarantine, the count would be lower.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
2 months ago
Yeah, those are valid reasons for the low sent count.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
2 months ago
I agree, no seeds and quarantine definitely impacted the sent count.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gladys
3 months ago
Ah, I reckon it's a combination of B and D. Those pressure typologies and a population that was too darn big really threw things off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
3 months ago
Hmm, I'd say it's definitely option C. Those quarantined recipients really messed up the numbers, didn't they?
upvoted 0 times
Marguerita
1 months ago
B) Some pressure typologies were applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
1 months ago
Yes, those quarantined recipients really affected the count.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
2 months ago
C) Some recipients were quarantined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
2 months ago
A) The upstream population did NOT include seeds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
3 months ago
I agree, those quarantined recipients really skewed the results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
3 months ago
Yes, option C definitely had a big impact on the sent count.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77