Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E330 Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E330 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All AD0-E330 Questions]

A client has a database of customers who purchase different products. Which data model approach should the Campaign Classic developer use to save the navigation information?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

In a scenario where customers can purchase multiple products, and each product can be purchased by multiple customers, a many-to-many data model is the most appropriate approach in Adobe Campaign Classic. This model involves creating a linking table (or schema) that references both the customer schema and the product schema.

By using a many-to-many relationship, the developer can efficiently track and manage customer-product associations without data redundancy. This structure enables accurate navigation and querying across customer purchases, providing flexibility to track purchases, manage customer preferences, and analyze purchasing behaviors across the entire customer base.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Shenika
19 days ago
I'm going to have to go with B on this one. It just seems like the most logical and straightforward approach to handling the navigation data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
20 days ago
Is option A even a real thing? I mean, it sounds like something a non-technical person would suggest. B is the way to go, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
Bette
5 days ago
I agree, option A does sound a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherilyn
28 days ago
Definitely option B. Maintaining separate schemas for each product and linking them to customers sounds like it could get messy really fast.
upvoted 0 times
Eulah
24 hours ago
I think option B is the way to go for this database structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
4 days ago
It would definitely simplify the navigation information for the developer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
7 days ago
Yeah, having a many-to-many relationship between customers and products makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
8 days ago
I agree, option B seems like the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wynell
1 months ago
Option C looks interesting, but I'm not sure it's the most efficient way to store the navigation information. I'd go with B.
upvoted 0 times
Alberta
14 days ago
Let's consider the pros and cons of each option before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
16 days ago
I see your point, but I still think option C, a data schema for each product linked to the customer schema, is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
19 days ago
I disagree, I believe option B, a many-to-many data schema, would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
1 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for saving navigation information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deangelo
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C would be more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
2 months ago
I think the developer should use option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
2 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense here. A many-to-many relationship between customers and products seems like the best way to handle the navigation data.
upvoted 0 times
Reiko
19 days ago
I see your point, but I still think option B offers more versatility in tracking customer navigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
20 days ago
But wouldn't option C be more efficient in terms of organizing the data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
24 days ago
I agree, option B would allow for a flexible relationship between customers and products.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77