Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E720 Topic 3 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E720 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 3
[All AD0-E720 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce developer was asked to customize a JavaScript component which is written as a function. How would the developer extend the native JavaScript function?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To customize a JavaScript component that is written as a function, the developer can use option A. This option will use the prototype property of the function to extend its functionality and add new methods or properties. For example:

function Component() { // Component logic }

Component.prototype.customMethod = function() { // Custom method logic };

This will create a new method called customMethod on the prototype of the Component function, which can be accessed by any instance of the Component object. The developer can also override existing methods or properties on the prototype by reassigning them with new values.

Option B is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new function that wraps the original function. This will not allow the developer to access or modify the properties or methods of the original function. Option C is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new object that inherits from the original function. This will not allow the developer to customize the original function itself, but only its instances.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Luke
4 months ago
Honestly, I'm just hoping the exam doesn't ask me to debug any spaghetti code. That's my worst nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
4 months ago
I always get nervous when I see complex code to debug.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
4 months ago
I know right, debugging can be a nightmare sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shayne
4 months ago
Option B? More like Option 'B-A-D', am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Precious
3 months ago
Definitely, let's focus on the right choice to extend the native JavaScript function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
4 months ago
Haha, clever one! But let's stick to the correct option for the JavaScript customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
4 months ago
Yes, you're right! Option B does seem a bit 'bad'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thaddeus
5 months ago
I'm torn, but I think I'll have to go with Option A. It's the classic approach, can't go wrong.
upvoted 0 times
Lynelle
3 months ago
Option C seems like the most efficient way to extend the function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
3 months ago
I think Option B might offer some interesting possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
4 months ago
I agree, Option A is the safe choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
4 months ago
Option C seems like the most efficient solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
4 months ago
I think Option B might offer more flexibility in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
4 months ago
I agree, Option A is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
5 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Gotta love that Object.create() action!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
5 months ago
Option B provides a more efficient way to extend the native JavaScript function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
5 months ago
I'm going with Option B. It just feels more elegant, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Lawrence
4 months ago
I think Option C might be a better fit for this particular customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
5 months ago
I agree, Option B does seem like the more elegant choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sage
5 months ago
Why do you think Option B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option B is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
5 months ago
Option A looks straightforward, that's my pick.
upvoted 0 times
Judy
4 months ago
I think so too, let's go with Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
5 months ago
I agree, Option A seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sage
5 months ago
I think the developer should choose Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77