Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E720 Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E720 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E720 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce developer was asked to customize a JavaScript component which is written as a function. How would the developer extend the native JavaScript function?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To customize a JavaScript component that is written as a function, the developer can use option A. This option will use the prototype property of the function to extend its functionality and add new methods or properties. For example:

function Component() { // Component logic }

Component.prototype.customMethod = function() { // Custom method logic };

This will create a new method called customMethod on the prototype of the Component function, which can be accessed by any instance of the Component object. The developer can also override existing methods or properties on the prototype by reassigning them with new values.

Option B is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new function that wraps the original function. This will not allow the developer to access or modify the properties or methods of the original function. Option C is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new object that inherits from the original function. This will not allow the developer to customize the original function itself, but only its instances.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Erick
5 months ago
I think most developers would agree that Option A is the most efficient choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
5 months ago
I see your point. Option A does seem more straightforward for customizing the JavaScript component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
6 months ago
Option A provides a clear and concise way to extend the function, that's why I prefer it over the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
6 months ago
But what about Option B or C? They also seem like potential solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
6 months ago
I agree, Option A seems like the best choice for extending the native JavaScript function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
7 months ago
I think the developer should go with Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
7 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go because it provides a clear and structured approach to customizing the function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option C would be the better choice for extending the function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
7 months ago
I think the developer can extend the native JavaScript function by using Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77