Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E720 Topic 4 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E720 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E720 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce developer needs to alias URLs and third party libraries inside a require js-config.js file. Which configuration would the developer use?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To alias URLs and third party libraries inside a requirejs-config.js file, the developer should use the paths configuration option. This option allows the developer to map module names to URLs or paths relative to the baseUrl. For example:

var config = { paths: { 'jquery': 'https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.min', 'custom': 'Vendor_Module/js/custom' } };

This will map the module name 'jquery' to the URL of the jQuery library and the module name 'custom' to the path of the custom module. The developer can then use these module names in other modules or files without specifying the full URL or path.

Option A is not correct because it uses the shim configuration option, which is used to define dependencies and exports for non-AMD modules, not to alias URLs or paths. Option C is not correct because it uses the map configuration option, which is used to map module names to other module names for specific contexts, not to alias URLs or paths. Reference: [RequireJS configuration], [RequireJS paths]


Contribute your Thoughts:

German
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go, my friends. It's the only one that doesn't look like it was written by a mathematician on a caffeine binge.
upvoted 0 times
Eugene
1 months ago
I think Option B is the best one for aliasing URLs and third party libraries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
2 months ago
Yeah, Option B seems much cleaner and easier to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
2 months ago
I agree, Option B is definitely the most readable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyssa
2 months ago
All these options look like they could work, but I'm going to go with Option B. It just seems the most straightforward and intuitive to me. Plus, who doesn't love a good ol' object literal, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Alita
1 months ago
Option B it is then! Object literals for the win.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B as well. It just seems like the most intuitive option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
1 months ago
Yeah, I think Option B is the way to go too. Object literals are always a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
2 months ago
I agree, Option B does seem like the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonio
3 months ago
Hold on, is this a trick question? I'm going with Option A because it's the only one that looks like it's actually written in JavaScript. The other options seem a bit too fancy for my taste.
upvoted 0 times
Clare
1 months ago
Yeah, Option A looks like the most reliable one for aliasing URLs and third party libraries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
1 months ago
I agree, Option A seems like the most practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 months ago
I think Option A is the way to go. It looks more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audra
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but Option C also seems to have some potential for aliasing URLs and third party libraries. It's a tough choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
3 months ago
I agree with Carmen, Option A looks like the most suitable configuration for aliasing URLs and third party libraries in require js-config.js file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
3 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. I've used that approach in my previous projects and it's worked like a charm. Plus, it's easier to read and maintain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
3 months ago
I think Option B is the correct configuration for aliasing URLs and third-party libraries in a require js-config.js file. It looks the most clean and organized to me.
upvoted 0 times
Halina
1 months ago
I see your point, but I still think Option B is the most organized configuration for aliasing URLs and third-party libraries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
2 months ago
I prefer Option C because it looks more straightforward for aliasing URLs and third-party libraries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
2 months ago
I think Option A might also work well for aliasing URLs and third-party libraries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the best choice for aliasing URLs and third-party libraries.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmen
3 months ago
I think the developer would use Option A because it seems to be related to aliasing URLs and third party libraries.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77