Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E722 Topic 4 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E722 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E722 Questions]

An Architect needs to review a custom product feed export module that a developer created for a merchant. During final testing before the solution is deployed, the product feed output is verified as correct. All unit and integration tests for code pass.

However, once the solution is deployed to production, the product price values in the feed are incorrect for several products. The products with incorrect data are all currently part of a content staging campaign where their prices have been reduced.

What did the developer do incorrectly that caused the feed output to be incorrect for products in the content staging campaign?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ariel
2 months ago
I think the developer made a mistake by not checking for the campaign state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
2 months ago
But maybe the developer should have also checked for an active content staging campaign.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
2 months ago
Ah, the classic 'I forgot to check for the content staging campaign' error. Reminds me of the time I accidentally released the 'half-off everything' feature to the whole company. Good times.
upvoted 0 times
Heidy
1 months ago
C) The developer did not check for an active content staging campaign and emulates the campaign state when retrieving product data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
1 months ago
B) The developer forgot to use the getContentStagingValue method to retrieve the active campaign value of the product data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
2 months ago
A) The developer retrieved product data directly from the database using the entity_id column rather than a collection or repository.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentin
2 months ago
I agree with Linsey, using the method would have prevented this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
2 months ago
The developer didn't check for an active content staging campaign? What is this, amateur hour? That's a critical oversight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
3 months ago
Hmm, seems like the developer went straight to the database instead of using a collection or repository. That's a big no-no in production.
upvoted 0 times
Katie
2 months ago
C) The developer did not check for an active content staging campaign and emulates the campaign state when retrieving product data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
2 months ago
B) The developer forgot to use the getContentStagingValue method to retrieve the active campaign value of the product data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
2 months ago
A) The developer retrieved product data directly from the database using the entity_id column rather than a collection or repository.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linsey
3 months ago
I think the developer should have used the getContentStagingValue method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
3 months ago
The developer should have used the getContentStagingValue method to retrieve the active campaign value. That's a rookie mistake.
upvoted 0 times
Becky
2 months ago
A) The developer should have used the getContentStagingValue method to retrieve the active campaign value. That's a rookie mistake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
2 months ago
B) The developer forgot to use the getContentStagingValue method to retrieve the active campaign value of the product data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
2 months ago
A) The developer retrieved product data directly from the database using the entity_id column rather than a collection or repository.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77