Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E908 Topic 4 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E908 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E908 Questions]

What is one of the primary benefits to setting up an automated proofing workflow instead of a basic workflow?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

One of the primary benefits of setting up an automated proofing workflow in Workfront, as opposed to a basic workflow, is the ability to create a series of review stages with dependencies between stages. This feature enhances the review process by:

Organizing Reviews: Multiple stages can be defined, ensuring that each stage is completed before the next begins, which helps maintain a structured and sequential review process.

Dependencies: Dependencies between stages ensure that proofs move through the review process in an orderly manner, with specific actions required at each stage.

Automation and Efficiency: Automating this process reduces the manual intervention needed, speeding up the overall proofing process and ensuring consistency across reviews.

This approach is highlighted in various user guides and advanced workflow setup training sessions for Workfront, emphasizing its efficiency and effectiveness in managing complex review processes.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Golda
2 months ago
LOL, I guess the real benefit is not having to manually wrangle all those reviewers. Bring on the automation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
2 months ago
Hmm, I think A sounds the most practical. Automating access permissions is a huge time-saver.
upvoted 0 times
Troy
19 days ago
I think A is the way to go for setting up an automated proofing workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
20 days ago
Yes, it's much more efficient than manually granting access to each reviewer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
1 months ago
I agree, automating access permissions can definitely save a lot of time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolf
2 months ago
I'm going with C. Getting all reviewers access right away is crucial for timely feedback.
upvoted 0 times
Annita
29 days ago
B) A series of review stages can be created with dependencies between stages
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
1 months ago
A) Read-only and Reviewer roles are automatically granted View access on the document if they had none previously
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 months ago
C) All required reviewers can access the proof immediately upon creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
2 months ago
Yes, that's true. It helps in ensuring a structured review process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 months ago
But what about creating review stages with dependencies? That sounds useful too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
3 months ago
I agree with Michael. It saves time and ensures timely feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
3 months ago
I think one benefit is that reviewers can access the proof immediately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
3 months ago
Definitely B. The ability to create interdependent review stages is a game-changer for streamlining the proofing process.
upvoted 0 times
Madelyn
3 months ago
It definitely makes the proofing process more efficient and ensures that all necessary steps are completed before moving on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
3 months ago
I agree, having dependencies between review stages really helps keep everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77