Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA Exam CPA-Financial Topic 1 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Financial exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 1
[All CPA-Financial Questions]

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

Item to Be Answered

During 1993, Quo determined that an insurance premium paid and entirely expensed in 1992 was for the period January 1, 1992, through January 1, 1994.

List B (Select one)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Choice 'B' is correct. If comparative FS are issued, restate prior year's FS. If comparative FS are not issued, restate prior year-end's retained earnings account by 'adjusting' (net of tax) the opening balance of the current retained earnings statement.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Tula
17 days ago
You know, I bet the president and the outside accountants are just trying to confuse us with all these options. But I'm not falling for it! Retroactive restatement, all the way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
18 days ago
I bet the answer is hidden in one of those fancy accounting terms. Let's see... 'Retroactive or retrospective restatement' - sounds like the right move to me. This is gonna be a breeze!
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
20 days ago
Prospective approach? Nah, that's not gonna work. We gotta go back and fix that 1992 financial statement, even if it means a bit more work. Retroactive all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Rana
4 days ago
Definitely, it's worth the extra effort to ensure the financial statements are accurate and reflect the true financial position of the company. Retroactive restatement is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
5 days ago
Yeah, it's better to make the necessary adjustments to the 1992 financial statements to ensure they are correct. Retroactive restatement is the most accurate approach in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
6 days ago
I agree, retroactive restatement is the way to go. It's important to accurately reflect the insurance premium expense for the correct period.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
7 days ago
Prospective approach? Nah, that's not gonna work. We gotta go back and fix that 1992 financial statement, even if it means a bit more work. Retroactive all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cathrine
24 days ago
Wait, so we're dealing with an insurance premium that covers two years? That's a tricky one. I guess the cumulative effect approach might be the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
28 days ago
Hmm, this seems pretty straightforward. I think the retroactive or retrospective restatement approach is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
7 days ago
Retroactively restating the 1992 financial statements will provide a more accurate picture of Quo's financial position.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
8 days ago
It's important to accurately reflect the insurance premium paid in 1992 for the correct period.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
18 days ago
I agree, the retroactive or retrospective restatement approach makes the most sense in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tegan
1 months ago
I agree with Margarita. The error affects a period prior to 1992, so restating the 1992 financial statements is necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77