Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA Exam CPA-Financial Topic 1 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Financial exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 1
[All CPA-Financial Questions]

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

Item to Be Answered

During 1993, Quo determined that an insurance premium paid and entirely expensed in 1992 was for the period January 1, 1992, through January 1, 1994.

List B (Select one)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Choice 'B' is correct. If comparative FS are issued, restate prior year's FS. If comparative FS are not issued, restate prior year-end's retained earnings account by 'adjusting' (net of tax) the opening balance of the current retained earnings statement.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Joana
4 months ago
I'm not an accountant, I'm a magician! But even I know the answer to this one. Retroactive restatement is the way to go, unless you want to pull a rabbit out of your hat to fix those 1992 numbers.
upvoted 0 times
Isreal
3 months ago
That's correct! The 1992 financial statements need to be restated to adjust the beginning retained earnings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
3 months ago
B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buddy
4 months ago
Prospective approach? What is this, amateur hour? Come on, Quo, step it up! Retroactive restatement is the only way to fly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
4 months ago
Ooh, a classic accounting conundrum! I'd say the cumulative effect approach is the way to go. Keep it simple, you know? 1993 is the year that matters, so let's just focus on that.
upvoted 0 times
Janey
3 months ago
Definitely, let's keep it simple and focus on 1993. The cumulative effect approach is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
3 months ago
Yeah, I think it makes sense to just include the adjustment in the 1993 financial statements and move forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
3 months ago
I agree, the cumulative effect approach seems like the most straightforward option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawnee
4 months ago
Retroactive all the way, baby! Can't have those 1992 numbers looking wonky. Gotta clean that up before the big shots come sniffing around.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
4 months ago
I see your point, Stephaine. But I think in this case, B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach is more appropriate to accurately reflect the impact of the error on prior periods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) Cumulative effect approach could also be a valid option. Including the adjustment in the 1993 financial statements without restating 1992.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
4 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I think the retroactive or retrospective restatement approach is the way to go here. Gotta keep those financial statements accurate, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Ocie
3 months ago
Absolutely, accuracy is key when it comes to financial reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
3 months ago
I think so too, it's crucial for accuracy and transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
4 months ago
Yeah, it's important to make sure the financial statements reflect the correct information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
4 months ago
I agree, the retroactive or retrospective restatement approach is definitely the best option in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracie
5 months ago
I agree with Alana. The error affects a period prior to 1992, so restating the 1992 financial statements makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77