Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA Exam CPA-Financial Topic 1 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Financial exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 1
[All CPA-Financial Questions]

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

Item to Be Answered

As a result of a production breakthrough, Quo determined that manufacturing equipment previously depreciated over 15 years should be depreciated over 20 years.

List B (Select one)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Choice 'C' is correct. This affects only the prospective (current and subsequent) periods - not prior periods, not retained earnings.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Stefanie
2 months ago
I'm just glad I don't have to be the one to explain these accounting changes to Quo's shareholders. Imagine trying to keep a straight face while saying 'retrospective restatement'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
2 months ago
Haha, Quo must have really messed up their accounting back in the day if they had to correct errors dating all the way back to 1992. I'd go with the retroactive approach to clean up that mess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The change in depreciation policy should be applied prospectively, so I'm going with option C.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
1 months ago
Yes, I also believe that the prospective approach is the correct accounting treatment for this transaction. Option C is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
1 months ago
I think so too. It makes sense to report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis without restating 1992 financial statements. Option C is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
2 months ago
I agree, the change in depreciation policy should be applied prospectively. Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raymon
2 months ago
Since the change in depreciation policy affects a period prior to 1992, I believe the retroactive or retrospective restatement approach is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
2 months ago
Hmm, the key here is that the change was a result of a production breakthrough, so I think the prospective approach would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
Leigha
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the prospective approach is the most logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
1 months ago
I see your point, but I still believe the retroactive restatement approach is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
1 months ago
I think the cumulative effect approach would be more appropriate in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
1 months ago
I agree, the prospective approach makes sense in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
2 months ago
I also believe the prospective approach is the most suitable option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
2 months ago
I think the retroactive restatement approach might be more appropriate in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 months ago
I agree, the prospective approach makes sense since the change is going forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louisa
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Prospective approach could also be a valid option. It depends on how Quo wants to present their financial statements going forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
3 months ago
I agree with Tarra. The manufacturing equipment depreciation change affects a period prior to 1992, so restating the 1992 financial statements makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77