Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA Exam CPA-Financial Topic 2 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Financial exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 2
[All CPA-Financial Questions]

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

Item to Be Answered

Quo manufactures heavy equipment to customer specifications on a contract basis. On the basis that it is preferable, accounting for these long-term contracts was switched from the completed-contract method to the percentage-of-completion method.

List B (Select one)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Choice 'B' is correct. Changes in accounting principle are handled 'retrospectively.' Beginning retained earnings of the earliest year presented is adjusted for the cumulative effect of the change and all prior year financial statements are restated.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Audra
3 months ago
Percentage-of-completion, you say? Sounds like Quo's accountants are having a real 'completed-contract' with reality. *ba dum tss*
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
3 months ago
Hmm, this one's a tougher call. I'm torn between the cumulative effect and retrospective restatement. Maybe I'll just roll a dice and hope for the best!
upvoted 0 times
Teresita
3 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to restate the 1992 financial statements if the change affects a period prior to 1992.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
3 months ago
I think the best option here is the retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sabra
3 months ago
Ah, the age-old debate of completed-contract vs. percentage-of-completion. I say go with the prospective approach - let's start fresh in 1993 and not worry about the past.
upvoted 0 times
Edmond
2 months ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
3 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marquetta
4 months ago
Retrospective restatement is the way to go here. We need to ensure the 1992 financials are restated to accurately reflect the new accounting policy. Anything less would be misleading.
upvoted 0 times
Xuan
2 months ago
Absolutely, it's the most accurate way to reflect the change in accounting policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
3 months ago
Retroactive restatement ensures consistency in financial reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
3 months ago
Yes, it's important to accurately reflect the impact of the accounting change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
3 months ago
I agree, restating the 1992 financials is crucial for transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Prospective approach could also be a valid option. It depends on how the company wants to handle the change in accounting method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
4 months ago
I agree with Xenia. Restating the 1992 financial statements seems like the right approach in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
4 months ago
The switch from the completed-contract method to the percentage-of-completion method seems like a reasonable change. I'd go with the cumulative effect approach to reflect the updated accounting policy in the 1993 financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
Delsie
3 months ago
The switch to the percentage-of-completion method will provide a more accurate reflection of Quo's financial position going forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
3 months ago
It makes sense to include the adjustment in the 1993 financial statements without restating the 1992 financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
4 months ago
I agree, the cumulative effect approach would be the best choice to show the impact of the change in accounting policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Xenia
4 months ago
I think the answer is B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77