Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA Exam CPA-Financial Topic 3 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Financial exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 3
[All CPA-Financial Questions]

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

Item to Be Answered

Quo manufactures heavy equipment to customer specifications on a contract basis. On the basis that it is preferable, accounting for these long-term contracts was switched from the completed-contract method to the percentage-of-completion method.

List B (Select one)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Choice 'B' is correct. Changes in accounting principle are handled 'retrospectively.' Beginning retained earnings of the earliest year presented is adjusted for the cumulative effect of the change and all prior year financial statements are restated.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Marvel
5 months ago
Percentage-of-completion, huh? Sounds like Quo's president has been watching a little too much 'The Accountant' starring Ben Affleck. I'd go with the cumulative effect approach myself.
upvoted 0 times
Sharmaine
4 months ago
I think the retroactive or retrospective restatement approach might be more accurate in reflecting the changes made by Reed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
4 months ago
I agree, the cumulative effect approach seems like the most appropriate choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nu
5 months ago
I think C) Prospective approach is not the best choice, as the change affects prior periods. So, I would go with B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Prospective approach could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
5 months ago
I agree with Hillary, because the change affects a period prior to 1992.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I can see the argument for both the cumulative effect and retrospective approaches. Gotta love those accountants and their love for acronyms!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. Wouldn't a retrospective restatement be better to give a clearer picture of the company's financials?
upvoted 0 times
Michel
4 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
5 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharita
5 months ago
The switch from completed-contract to percentage-of-completion method seems like the right call. The cumulative effect approach makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
Willow
5 months ago
Yes, it ensures that the adjustment is included in the 1993 financial statements without restating the 1992 financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
5 months ago
I agree, the cumulative effect approach is the best choice for this transaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hillary
6 months ago
I think the answer is B) Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77