Alibaba Exam ACA-Developer Topic 8 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-Developer exam

Question #: 63
Topic #: 8

When versioning is enabled for an OSS Bucket, previous versions of objects will be retained, using storage space and incurring additional costs. How can you save space and reduce costs, while retaining some of the benefits of object versioning?

AAvoid using version management.

BUse the Function Compute Service to regularly check for and delete old versions of objects.

CUse OSS s built in lifecycle management capabilities to automatically delete old versions of objects after a set time.

DUse OSS's built in lifecycle management capabilities to move old versions of objects to Archival Storage.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Lezlie at Jun 29, 2024, 02:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACA-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Antonio

4 months ago

Versioning is great, but it can get expensive. Gotta love that lifecycle management!

upvoted 0 times

Moira

3 months ago

B) Use the Function Compute Service to regularly check for and delete old versions of objects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Natalie

4 months ago

D) Use OSS's built in lifecycle management capabilities to move old versions of objects to Archival Storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyce

4 months ago

C) Use OSS's built in lifecycle management capabilities to automatically delete old versions of objects after a set time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlene

4 months ago

I'd rather not have the Function Compute team snoop around my buckets, so C is my pick.

upvoted 0 times

Wade

3 months ago

That's a good point, it's important to find a balance between saving space and retaining important data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lili

3 months ago

In that case, we could use OSS's lifecycle management to move old versions to Archival Storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashaunda

3 months ago

But what if we want to keep some old versions for backup purposes?

upvoted 0 times

...

Bev

3 months ago

I agree, using OSS's built-in lifecycle management to automatically delete old versions seems like the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernie

5 months ago

That's true, Chaya. It depends on the specific needs and requirements of the project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

5 months ago

But what about option D? Moving old versions to Archival Storage could also be a cost-effective solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

5 months ago

I agree with Ernie, using lifecycle management to save space and reduce costs makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zachary

5 months ago

Haha, option A? Yeah, right, that's like throwing away the whole purpose of versioning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerlene

5 months ago

Archival storage is the smart move, D for the win! Saves space and keeps the history.

upvoted 0 times

Jaime

4 months ago

I agree, it's important to find a balance between saving space and retaining important data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corinne

4 months ago

Using OSS's built-in lifecycle management capabilities sounds like a good solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefanie

4 months ago

Definitely, Archival storage is a smart move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Burma

4 months ago

D for the win! Saves space and keeps the history.

upvoted 0 times

...

Percy

5 months ago

Option C is the way to go! It's a built-in feature, so no need to mess with any extra services.

upvoted 0 times

Truman

4 months ago

D) Use OSS's built in lifecycle management capabilities to move old versions of objects to Archival Storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

5 months ago

Option C sounds like the most efficient solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

5 months ago

C) Use OSS's built in lifecycle management capabilities to automatically delete old versions of objects after a set time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernie

6 months ago

I think option C is a good idea to automatically delete old versions of objects.

upvoted 0 times

...