Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 3 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 3
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company has established connectivity between its on-premises data center in Paris, France, and the AWS Cloud by using an AWS Direct Connect connection. The company uses a transit VIF that connects the Direct Connect connection with a transit gateway that is hosted in the Europe (Paris) Region. The company hosts workloads in private subnets in several VPCs that are attached to the transit gateway.

The company recently acquired another corporation that hosts workloads on premises in an office building in Tokyo, Japan. The company needs to migrate the workloads from the Tokyo office to AWS. These workloads must have access to the company's existing workloads in Paris. The company also must establish connectivity between the Tokyo office building and the Paris data center.

In the Asia Pacific (Tokyo) Region, the company creates a new VPC with private subnets for migration of the workloads. The workload migration must be completed in 5 days. The workloads cannot be directly accessible from the internet.

Which set of steps should a network engineer take to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Option C is the best solution because it allows the company to use transit gateways to connect the VPCs in different regions and the on-premises sites. Transit gateways support inter-region peering and VPN attachments, which enable secure and scalable connectivity. Option A is not valid because public subnets are not suitable for workloads that cannot be directly accessible from the internet. Option B is not valid because Direct Connect connections take longer than 5 days to provision.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Adelina
4 months ago
Option D is the way to go, just direct VPN from Tokyo to Paris. Who needs all those fancy transit gateways and peering connections? Keep it simple, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
4 months ago
C is the way to go. Gotta love those transit gateways, they make life so much easier. Plus, the Site-to-Site VPN is a classic move - reliable and secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
4 months ago
Haha, I'd just go with the 'wing it' approach. Set up a bunch of public subnets and open up the security groups. That's the fastest way to get it done, right?
upvoted 0 times
Lashanda
3 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
4 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherrell
4 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Option B also seems like a valid solution, using Direct Connect from the Tokyo office to the transit gateway. That might be a bit faster to set up.
upvoted 0 times
Verdell
3 months ago
Yeah, both options have their pros and cons. It depends on the company's specific needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
3 months ago
I think Option C could work too. Setting up a Site-to-Site VPN connection might be more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
3 months ago
Option B seems like a good choice. Direct Connect can be faster to set up.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margart
4 months ago
I think C is the best option because it involves setting up a transit gateway in Tokyo and using an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection for connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
5 months ago
The correct answer is definitely C. Setting up a transit gateway in the Tokyo region and using a Site-to-Site VPN connection is the most efficient way to establish connectivity between the offices while keeping the workloads isolated from the internet.
upvoted 0 times
Karrie
3 months ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
3 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
3 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
3 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
4 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
4 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lai
5 months ago
Why do you think C is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77