Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 7 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 7
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company has established connectivity between its on-premises data center in Paris, France, and the AWS Cloud by using an AWS Direct Connect connection. The company uses a transit VIF that connects the Direct Connect connection with a transit gateway that is hosted in the Europe (Paris) Region. The company hosts workloads in private subnets in several VPCs that are attached to the transit gateway.

The company recently acquired another corporation that hosts workloads on premises in an office building in Tokyo, Japan. The company needs to migrate the workloads from the Tokyo office to AWS. These workloads must have access to the company's existing workloads in Paris. The company also must establish connectivity between the Tokyo office building and the Paris data center.

In the Asia Pacific (Tokyo) Region, the company creates a new VPC with private subnets for migration of the workloads. The workload migration must be completed in 5 days. The workloads cannot be directly accessible from the internet.

Which set of steps should a network engineer take to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Option C is the best solution because it allows the company to use transit gateways to connect the VPCs in different regions and the on-premises sites. Transit gateways support inter-region peering and VPN attachments, which enable secure and scalable connectivity. Option A is not valid because public subnets are not suitable for workloads that cannot be directly accessible from the internet. Option B is not valid because Direct Connect connections take longer than 5 days to provision.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Bronwyn
4 months ago
I'm surprised option A even made it onto the list. Peering between VPCs? What is this, the Stone Age? Option B is the future, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
4 months ago
Option B is the clear winner here. No need to overcomplicate things with public subnets and internet gateways when you have the powerful Direct Connect and transit gateway features at your disposal.
upvoted 0 times
Ozell
3 months ago
Let's go with Option B for the migration of workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
4 months ago
It's definitely the most efficient way to establish connectivity between the Tokyo office and the Paris data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
4 months ago
I agree, using transit gateways and Direct Connect makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
4 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latrice
5 months ago
I personally prefer option D. Configuring an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection directly from the Tokyo office to the Paris transit gateway seems like a straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
5 months ago
Option C is also a viable solution, but it requires an additional VPN connection from the Tokyo office, which could add some complexity. I think option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Hoa
3 months ago
It's important to ensure smooth data flow between the sites and VPCs during the migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
3 months ago
Yeah, setting up a new Direct Connect connection from Tokyo to the transit gateway makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
3 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
4 months ago
It definitely seems like the most efficient way to establish connectivity between the Tokyo office and the Paris data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
4 months ago
Yeah, setting up a transit gateway in Tokyo and connecting it to the Paris transit gateway sounds like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
4 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geraldine
5 months ago
I'm not sure, I think option C could also work. Setting up an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection from the Tokyo office might be a good alternative.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
5 months ago
I agree with Amos. Option B seems to be the most efficient way to establish connectivity between the Tokyo office and the Paris data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
5 months ago
I agree with Dortha. Option B covers all the necessary steps, including the creation of peering connections between the transit gateways in Tokyo and Paris. This ensures seamless communication between the workloads.
upvoted 0 times
Reuben
5 months ago
I think so too. It covers all the necessary steps for the migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
5 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amos
5 months ago
I think option B is the best choice because it involves setting up a transit gateway in Tokyo and creating peering connections with Paris.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
5 months ago
The steps provided in option B seem to be the most comprehensive and straightforward approach to meeting the requirements. Establishing a direct connection from the Tokyo office to the Tokyo transit gateway is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
Carlene
4 months ago
Configuring routing on both transit gateways will allow data to flow smoothly between sites and VPCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
5 months ago
Creating a new Direct Connect connection from the Tokyo office to the Tokyo transit gateway ensures a secure connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
5 months ago
I agree, setting up a transit gateway in Tokyo and connecting it with Paris through peering connections makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
5 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77