Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam DAS-C01 Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DAS-C01 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 2
[All DAS-C01 Questions]

A company uses Amazon EC2 instances to receive files from external vendors throughout each day. At the end of each day, the EC2 instances combine the files into a single file, perform gzip compression, and upload the single file to an Amazon S3 bucket. The total size of all the files is approximately 100 GB each day.

When the files are uploaded to Amazon S3, an AWS Batch job runs a COPY command to load the files into an Amazon Redshift cluster.

Which solution will MOST accelerate the COPY process?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Farrah
5 months ago
That makes sense. I agree with you.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure these are all the right answers? I thought there was supposed to be a 'none of the above' option for these tricky AWS questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
5 months ago
Because splitting the files to match the number of slices in the Redshift cluster will optimize the COPY process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
5 months ago
Haha, Shawna's got a point. If you have a skewed distribution on that DISTKEY, option D could be a real game-changer. Gotta love those database optimization tricks!
upvoted 0 times
Deonna
4 months ago
Definitely, leveraging database optimization techniques is key in scenarios like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
4 months ago
I agree, it's all about maximizing efficiency when dealing with large datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
5 months ago
Yeah, sharding based on the DISTKEY columns could really improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
5 months ago
Option D sounds like a solid choice for optimizing the COPY process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Farrah
5 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
5 months ago
I think option B is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
6 months ago
Hold on, what if I have a really big DISTKEY column? Wouldn't option D be even better by sharding the files based on that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
6 months ago
I was thinking the same thing. Compressing and uploading the files to S3 in a way that aligns with the Redshift architecture is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
Darrin
5 months ago
B: D) Apply sharding by breaking up the files so that the DISTKEY columns with the same values go to the same file. Compress and upload the sharded files to Amazon S3. Run the COPY command on the files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
5 months ago
A: B) Split the files so that the number of files is equal to a multiple of the number of slices in the Redshift cluster. Compress and upload the files to Amazon S3. Run the COPY command on the files.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
6 months ago
Option B sounds like the way to go. Splitting the files to match the number of slices in the Redshift cluster should definitely speed up the COPY process.
upvoted 0 times
Clorinda
5 months ago
Definitely, it's important to optimize the process for faster performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
5 months ago
Yeah, splitting the files to match the number of slices in the Redshift cluster makes a lot of sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
5 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most efficient way to accelerate the COPY process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77