Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam DAS-C01 Topic 4 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DAS-C01 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 4
[All DAS-C01 Questions]

An advertising company has a data lake that is built on Amazon S3. The company uses AWS Glue Data Catalog to maintain the metadat

a. The data lake is several years old and its overall size has increased exponentially as additional data sources and metadata are stored in the data lake. The data lake administrator wants to implement a mechanism to simplify permissions management between Amazon S3 and the Data Catalog to keep them in sync

Which solution will simplify permissions management with minimal development effort?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dortha
8 months ago
Oof, this is a tough one. I can see the merits of both options B and C, but I'm a little hesitant about the development effort required. I wonder if there's a way to automate some of that process, you know? Like, maybe we could write a script or something to handle the permissions management for us. That could be a real time-saver.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
8 months ago
You know, I was actually leaning towards option A at first. Setting IAM permissions for AWS Glue seems like it could be a good way to simplify things. But then I started thinking about the overall size of the data lake and the need to keep everything in sync. Maybe option B is the way to go, even if it's a bit more heavy-duty.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
8 months ago
I'm not so sure about that, to be honest. Option B might be the most straightforward solution, but I'm wondering if it's overkill for this use case. What about option C, managing the permissions using bucket policies? That could be a simpler approach, and it might be more flexible in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. The data lake has grown exponentially, and the administrator needs a way to simplify permissions management between S3 and the Data Catalog. I think option B, using AWS Lake Formation permissions, is the way to go here. It's designed specifically for managing permissions in a data lake, and it can help keep everything in sync with minimal development effort.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77