Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon Exam DOP-C01 Topic 20 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DOP-C01 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 20
[All DOP-C01 Questions]

A company is required to collect user consent to a privacy agreement. An application is deployed in six AWS Regions with two in North America, two in Europe, and two in Asia with a user base of 20-30 million users. The company needs to read and write data related to each user's response, and ensure the responses are available in all six Regions.

What solution will satisfy these requirements while MINIMIZING latency?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jean at May 23, 2024, 12:28 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DOP-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Merrilee
7 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer is just trying to trick us with those other options. DynamoDB global tables are clearly the best solution here. Simple and reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
7 months ago
I'm not sure about that, Trinidad. Aurora might be overkill for just storing user consent data. DynamoDB global tables sound more cost-effective and scalable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
7 months ago
Wait, why not go with Aurora Global Database? Isn't that designed for this kind of global data replication scenario? Plus, it's a fully managed service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
7 months ago
Hmm, I think option C is the way to go. DynamoDB global tables seem like the perfect solution for this use case. Low latency and high availability across all six regions.
upvoted 0 times
Valene
5 months ago
I agree, let's go with option C for the privacy agreement consent collection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
5 months ago
That's true, but DynamoDB global tables seem like the most straightforward solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
5 months ago
I still think Amazon ElastiCache for Redis replication group could be a good choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
6 months ago
True, and with the user base being so large, scalability is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
6 months ago
I think DynamoDB global tables would be more cost-effective and easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
6 months ago
Yes, DynamoDB global tables are designed for exactly this kind of scenario. It's the best choice for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
6 months ago
But what about Amazon Aurora Global Database? Wouldn't that also be a good option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
6 months ago
I agree, DynamoDB global tables would definitely help in ensuring low latency and high availability across all regions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
7 months ago
I agree, DynamoDB global tables would definitely help with minimizing latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77