Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam DOP-C01 Topic 5 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DOP-C01 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 5
[All DOP-C01 Questions]

You have an application consisting of a stateless web server tier running on Amazon EC2 instances behind load balancer, and are using Amazon RDS with read replicas. Which of the following methods should you use to implement a self-healing and cost-effective architecture? Choose 2 answers from the optionsgiven below

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, G

The scaling of CC2 Instances in the Autoscaling group is normally done with the metric of the CPU

utilization of the current instances in the Autoscaling group

For more information on scaling in your Autoscaling Group, please refer to the below link:

* http://docs.aws.a mazon.com/autoscaling/latest/userguide/as-scaling-si mple-step.html

Amazon RDS Multi-AZ deployments provide enhanced availability and durability for Database (DB) Instances, making them a natural fit for production database workloads. When you provision a Multi-AZ DB Instance, Amazon RDS automatically creates a primary DB Instance and synchronously replicates the data to a standby instance in a different Availability Zone (AZ). Cach AZ runs on its own physically distinct, independent infrastructure, and is engineered to be highly reliable. In case of an infrastructure failure, Amazon RDS performs an automatic failover to the standby for to a read replica in the case of Amazon Aurora), so that you can resume database operations as soon as the failover is complete. For more information on RDS Multi-AZ please refer to the below link:

https://aws.amazon.com/rds/details/multi-az/

Option A is invalid because if you already have in-built metrics from Cloudwatch, why would you want to spend more in using a a third-party monitoring solution.

Option B is invalid because health checks are already a feature of AWS CLB

Option C is invalid because the database CPU usage should not be used to scale the web tier.

Option C is invalid because increasing the instance size does not always guarantee that the solution will not become unhealthy.

Option F is invalid because increasing Read-Replica's will not suffice for write operations if the primary DB fails.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!


Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77