Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam DOP-C02 Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DOP-C02 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All DOP-C02 Questions]

A company is examining its disaster recovery capability and wants the ability to switch over its daily operations to a secondary AWS Region. The company uses AWS CodeCommit as a source control tool in the primary Region.

A DevOps engineer must provide the capability for the company to develop code in the secondary Region. If the company needs to use the secondary Region, developers can add an additional remote URL to their local Git configuration.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gaynell
7 months ago
I still prefer Option A because it specifically addresses the need for mirroring the CodeCommit repository for disaster recovery purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
7 months ago
That's true, Alease. Option C does involve using CodeArtifact, which could provide a reliable method for storing code in the secondary Region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
7 months ago
I'm not sure. Option C also looks like a good solution with CodePipeline and CodeArtifact involved. It could be a viable option as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
7 months ago
I agree with Bernardo. Option A seems to be the most efficient way to ensure the company can develop code in the secondary Region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
7 months ago
I think option A is the best solution because it involves creating a CodeCommit repository in the secondary Region and using CodeBuild to mirror the repository.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
8 months ago
Ha, yeah, the CodeArtifact approach is a bit like using a bazooka to kill a fly. I think we can stick with the good ol' CodeCommit mirroring in option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
8 months ago
I agree, option A looks like the best fit. Although, I do wonder if the S3 bucket approach in option B might be a bit simpler to implement. Hmm, decisions, decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anna
8 months ago
Alright, I think we've got a consensus on option A. Let's go with that and hope the examiners don't try to trick us with any sneaky follow-up questions!
upvoted 0 times
Olene
7 months ago
Fingers crossed that the exam questions are straightforward!
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
7 months ago
Agreed, understanding the architecture is key to implementing it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
8 months ago
Let's make sure we are familiar with each component and its role in the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
8 months ago
It's always good to be prepared for any scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
8 months ago
The combination of CodeCommit, CodeBuild, Lambda, and EventBridge is solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
8 months ago
I agree, it covers all the necessary steps for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
8 months ago
Option A seems like the most complete solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tenesha
8 months ago
Ooh, option C with the CodeArtifact repo is an interesting twist. That could provide an extra layer of redundancy, but might be overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77