Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam MLS-C01 Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's MLS-C01 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 2
[All MLS-C01 Questions]

A machine learning (ML) developer for an online retailer recently uploaded a sales dataset into Amazon SageMaker Studio. The ML developer wants to obtain importance scores for each feature of the dataset. The ML developer will use the importance scores to feature engineer the dataset.

Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST development effort?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

SageMaker Data Wrangler is a feature of SageMaker Studio that provides an end-to-end solution for importing, preparing, transforming, featurizing, and analyzing data. Data Wrangler includes built-in analyses that help generate visualizations and data insights in a few clicks. One of the built-in analyses is the Quick Model visualization, which can be used to quickly evaluate the data and produce importance scores for each feature. A feature importance score indicates how useful a feature is at predicting a target label. The feature importance score is between [0, 1] and a higher number indicates that the feature is more important to the whole dataset. The Quick Model visualization uses a random forest model to calculate the feature importance for each feature using the Gini importance method. This method measures the total reduction in node impurity (a measure of how well a node separates the classes) that is attributed to splitting on a particular feature. The ML developer can use the Quick Model visualization to obtain the importance scores for each feature of the dataset and use them to feature engineer the dataset. This solution requires the least development effort compared to the other options.

References:

* Analyze and Visualize

* Detect multicollinearity, target leakage, and feature correlation with Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler


Contribute your Thoughts:

Harris
5 months ago
They could be, but I think the lasso feature selection method would provide more accurate importance scores.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
5 months ago
But wouldn't PCA or singular value decomposition also be good options for feature engineering?
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D) using multicollinearity feature for lasso feature selection is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
5 months ago
Singul-what now? I think I'll stick with the Gini importance score. It's simple, effective, and I won't have to explain any fancy pants linear algebra terms.
upvoted 0 times
Judy
5 months ago
B: Yeah, it's definitely the easiest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
5 months ago
A: I agree, Gini importance score is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elly
5 months ago
Lol, I'm just picturing the ML developer trying to explain 'multicollinearity' to the business team. Might as well throw in 'eigenvectors' and 'eigenvalues' while they're at it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
6 months ago
Why not go for the lasso feature selection? It can handle multicollinearity and provide importance scores. Seems like the most comprehensive solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
Yvonne
5 months ago
B: I agree, it would definitely require the least development effort compared to the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
5 months ago
A: I think using SageMaker Data Wrangler for Gini importance score analysis would be the easiest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kassandra
6 months ago
I think option A) using SageMaker Data Wrangler for Gini importance score analysis would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
6 months ago
I prefer PCA over Gini importance. It's a more versatile technique that can capture the underlying relationships in the data. The SageMaker notebook instance gives me more control too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
6 months ago
Option A sounds like the way to go. Gini importance is a straightforward and easy-to-use feature selection method. Plus, with SageMaker Data Wrangler, the whole process should be a breeze.
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
5 months ago
Definitely, it's the least development effort and should make the process smooth for the ML developer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
5 months ago
I think so too. It's a simple and effective way to get the importance scores we need for feature engineering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
5 months ago
I agree, using SageMaker Data Wrangler for Gini importance score analysis seems like the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77