Amazon Exam PAS-C01 Topic 5 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's PAS-C01 exam

Question #: 22
Topic #: 5

A company uses an SAP application that runs batch jobs that ate performance sensitive. The batch jobs can be restarted safely The SAP application has sot application servers. The SAP application functions reliability as long as the SAP application availability remains greater than 60%. The company wants to migrate the SAP application to AWS. The company is using a duster with two Availability Zones

How should the company distribute the SAP application servers to maintain system reliability?

ADistribute the SAP application servers equally across three partition placement groups

BDistribute the SAP application servers equally across three Availability Zones

CDistribute the SAP application servers equally across two Availability Zones

DCreate an Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling group across two Availability Zones Set a minimum capacity value of 4.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

C is correct because distributing the SAP application servers equally across two Availability Zones provides system reliability by ensuring that at least three application servers are available in each Availability Zone. This meets the requirement that the SAP application availability remains greater than 60%. This will also provide an additional layer of redundancy and protection against a single point of failure. Reference: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/sap-on-aws-technical-deployment-guide/high-availability.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/sap-on-aws-technical-deployment-guide/amazon-ec2.html

by Kate at Oct 18, 2023, 09:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Chana

8 months ago

Hmm, I don't know. Option D with the Auto Scaling group could work too. That way, you'd have a bit more redundancy and flexibility if one of the Availability Zones fails.

upvoted 0 times

...

Naomi

8 months ago

Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. Plus, it's the most efficient option since we don't need to use a third Availability Zone or set up a complex Auto Scaling group.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linette

8 months ago

I agree. Option C seems like the best choice here. Distributing the SAP application servers equally across two Availability Zones should ensure that the system remains reliable, even if one Availability Zone goes down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

8 months ago

This question seems pretty straightforward. The company needs to maintain at least 60% availability for the SAP application, and they're using a cluster with two Availability Zones.

upvoted 0 times

...