Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SAA-C03 Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAA-C03 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 1
[All SAA-C03 Questions]

Asocial media company has workloads that collect and process data The workloads store the data in on-premises NFS storage The data store cannot scale fast enough to meet the company's expanding business needs The company wants to migrate the current data store to AWS

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This solution meets the requirements most cost-effectively because it enables the company to migrate its on-premises NFS data store to AWS without changing the existing applications or workflows. AWS Storage Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides seamless and secure integration between on-premises and AWS storage. Amazon S3 File Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a file interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. By setting up an Amazon S3 File Gateway, the company can store and retrieve files as objects in Amazon S3 using standard file protocols such as NFS. The company can also use an Amazon S3 Lifecycle policy to automatically transition the data to the appropriate storage class based on the frequency of access and the cost of storage. For example, the company can use S3 Standard for frequently accessed data, S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) or S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) for less frequently accessed data, and S3 Glacier or S3 Glacier Deep Archive for long-term archival data.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a block interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. Volume Gateway is not suitable for migrating an NFS data store, as it requires attaching the volumes to EC2 instances or on-premises servers using the iSCSI protocol. Option C is not a valid solution because Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) is a fully managed elastic NFS file system that is designed for workloads that require high availability, scalability, and performance. Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (Standard-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that is optimized for infrequently accessed files, with a lower price per GB and a higher price per access. Using Amazon EFS Standard-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. Option D is not a valid solution because Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access (One Zone-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that is optimized for infrequently accessed files that do not require the availability and durability of Amazon EFS Standard or Standard-IA. Amazon EFS One Zone-IA stores data in a single Availability Zone, which reduces the cost by 47% compared to Amazon EFS Standard-IA, but also increases the risk of data loss in the event of an Availability Zone failure. Using Amazon EFS One Zone-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. It would also compromise the availability and durability of the data.


AWS Storage Gateway - Amazon Web Services

Amazon S3 File Gateway - AWS Storage Gateway

Object Lifecycle Management - Amazon Simple Storage Service

[AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway - AWS Storage Gateway]

[Amazon Elastic File System - Amazon Web Services]

[Using EFS storage classes - Amazon Elastic File System]

Contribute your Thoughts:

India
4 months ago
This reminds me of that time my cousin tried to migrate his personal photo collection to the cloud... let's just say it didn't end well. Maybe they should just stick with on-premises storage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
4 months ago
Haha, I bet the company's IT team is going to have a field day trying to figure this one out! Option D sounds like it might be the most 'one-zone' solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
4 months ago
Option C looks promising, as the EFS Standard-IA storage class could provide a cost-effective solution without the need for additional gateways.
upvoted 0 times
Shelba
3 months ago
Let's go with option C then, it should meet our requirements without adding extra complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
3 months ago
I agree, using Amazon EFS Standard-IA storage class seems like a straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorriane
4 months ago
I think option C is a good choice for cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veronica
4 months ago
I think Option B might be a better choice, as the S3 File Gateway provides a more seamless integration with the existing NFS storage.
upvoted 0 times
Fallon
3 months ago
I still think Option B might be easier to implement though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
3 months ago
That's true, Option A with the Volume Gateway could save on costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
3 months ago
But wouldn't Option A be more cost-effective in the long run?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
4 months ago
I agree, Option B does seem like a good choice for seamless integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evangelina
5 months ago
Option A seems like a good fit, as it allows for scalable storage and cost optimization through the S3 Lifecycle policy.
upvoted 0 times
Elliot
3 months ago
It's a smart way to transition data to the appropriate storage class while scaling efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
3 months ago
I agree, using an AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway with S3 Lifecycle policy makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
4 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for cost-effective storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
4 months ago
Agreed, it will help with scalability and optimizing costs for the company's expanding business needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
4 months ago
Yeah, setting up an AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway and using the S3 Lifecycle policy sounds cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
4 months ago
I think option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ena
5 months ago
I prefer option D because it uses Amazon Elastic File System One Zone-Infrequent Access storage class, which can be cost-effective for the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
5 months ago
But option C also seems like a good solution with Amazon Elastic File System Standard-Infrequent Access storage class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more cost-effective as it utilizes AWS Storage Gateway Amazon S3 File Gateway.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
6 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it uses AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway and Amazon S3 Lifecycle policy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77