Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SAA-C03 Topic 2 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAA-C03 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 2
[All SAA-C03 Questions]

A company wants to use NAT gateways in its AWS environment. The company's Amazon EC2 instances in private subnets must be able to connect to the public internet through the NAT gateways.

Which solution will meet these requirements'?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

A public NAT gateway enables instances in a private subnet to send outbound traffic to the internet, while preventing the internet from initiating connections with the instances. A public NAT gateway requires an elastic IP address and a route to the internet gateway for the VPC. A private NAT gateway enables instances in a private subnet to connect to other VPCs or on-premises networks through a transit gateway or a virtual private gateway. A private NAT gateway does not require an elastic IP address or an internet gateway. Both private and public NAT gateways map the source private IPv4 address of the instances to the private IPv4 address of the NAT gateway, but in the case of a public NAT gateway, the internet gateway then maps the private IPv4 address of the public NAT gateway to the elastic IP address associated with the NAT gateway. When sending response traffic to the instances, whether it's a public or private NAT gateway, the NAT gateway translates the address back to the original source IP address.

Creating public NAT gateways in the same private subnets as the EC2 instances (option A) is not a valid solution, as the NAT gateways would not have a route to the internet gateway. Creating private NAT gateways in the same private subnets as the EC2 instances (option B) is also not a valid solution, as the instances would not be able to access the internet through the private NAT gateways. Creating private NAT gateways in public subnets in the same VPCs as the EC2 instances (option D) is not a valid solution either, as the internet gateway would drop the traffic from the private NAT gateways.

Therefore, the only valid solution is to create public NAT gateways in public subnets in the same VPCs as the EC2 instances (option C), as this would allow the instances to access the internet through the public NAT gateways and the internet gateway.Reference:

NAT gateways - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

NAT gateway use cases - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Amazon Web Services -- Introduction to NAT Gateways

What is AWS NAT Gateway? - KnowledgeHut


Contribute your Thoughts:

Marguerita
3 months ago
Creating public NAT gateways in public subnets? That's like using a megaphone to whisper a secret. Option C is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Kenia
3 months ago
Exactly, creating public NAT gateways in public subnets ensures the EC2 instances can connect to the internet securely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
3 months ago
Option C) Create public NAT gateways in public subnets in the same VPCs as the EC2 instances
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melita
3 months ago
Because private NAT gateways in public subnets will allow the EC2 instances to connect to the public internet while keeping them secure in private subnets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
3 months ago
Wait, a private NAT gateway in a public subnet? That's like putting a guard dog in the middle of the street. Option C is the only logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Alayna
3 months ago
No, because the private subnets are not directly connected to the internet. Option C is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
3 months ago
But wouldn't creating public NAT gateways in the same private subnets work too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
3 months ago
Option C) Create public NAT gateways in public subnets in the same VPCs as the EC2 instances
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristeen
4 months ago
Why do you think D is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about creating NAT gateways in the same private subnets as the EC2 instances. Seems like that could create some confusion. Option C is my pick.
upvoted 0 times
Nettie
3 months ago
Yeah, it's important to have the NAT gateways in the right location to ensure connectivity for the EC2 instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
3 months ago
Creating private NAT gateways in the same private subnets as the EC2 instances might not work as intended.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
3 months ago
I agree, having the NAT gateways in public subnets will allow the EC2 instances in private subnets to connect to the internet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
3 months ago
I think option C makes sense. Creating public NAT gateways in public subnets seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Winfred
4 months ago
Wouldn't a private NAT gateway in a public subnet be a security risk? I think Option C is the safest choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
3 months ago
Option C, creating public NAT gateways in public subnets in the same VPCs as the EC2 instances, would be the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
3 months ago
I agree, having a private NAT gateway in a public subnet does seem like a security risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristeen
4 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
4 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Public NAT gateways in public subnets make the most sense to connect private instances to the internet.
upvoted 0 times
Minna
3 months ago
Public NAT gateways in public subnets will allow the private instances to access the internet securely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
3 months ago
Creating public NAT gateways in public subnets in the same VPCs as the EC2 instances is the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
4 months ago
I agree, option C is the best choice for connecting private instances to the internet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77