Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SCS-C02 Topic 8 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SCS-C02 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 8
[All SCS-C02 Questions]

A company has a web-based application that runs behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB). The application is experiencing a credential stuffing attack that is producing many failed login attempts. The attack is coming from many IP addresses. The login attempts are using a user agent string of a known mobile device emulator.

A security engineer needs to implement a solution to mitigate the credential stuffing attack. The solution must still allow legitimate logins to the application.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To mitigate a credential stuffing attack against a web-based application behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB), creating an AWS WAF web ACL with a custom rule to block requests containing the known malicious user agent string is an effective solution. This approach allows for precise targeting of the attack vector (the user agent string of the device emulator) without impacting legitimate users. AWS WAF provides the capability to inspect HTTP(S) requests and block those that match defined criteria, such as specific strings in the user agent header, thereby preventing malicious requests from reaching the application.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Darrin
6 months ago
True, but the question says the attack uses a known mobile emulator. C makes sense then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
6 months ago
But won't C block all traffic from that user agent, even if it's legitimate?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
6 months ago
Blocking the specific user agent string with AWS WAF seems more targeted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
7 months ago
Why C? I think D could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
7 months ago
Yeah, it’s tricky. I'm leaning towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
7 months ago
This question seems challenging, any thoughts?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77