Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

American Bankers Association Exam CRCM Topic 4 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for American Bankers Association's CRCM exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 4
[All CRCM Questions]

Which of the following is MOST effective in strengthening an anti-money laundering program involving cash transactions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nathalie
4 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of how to catch the money launderers. Maybe we should just install a giant cash-sniffing dog at the entrance. Woof!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
4 months ago
Option A? Really? Who deposits $25,000 in cash these days? That's just asking to get robbed. Pass.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
4 months ago
Option B sounds like a lot of paperwork, but it might be worth it to have a paper trail. I'm not sure I trust the bank tellers to catch everything.
upvoted 0 times
Tyisha
3 months ago
Francesco: Tyisha, that's a good point. It's important to catch any suspicious activity, no matter the amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
4 months ago
Daron, I think monitoring cash transactions of less than $10,000 for suspicious patterns is also important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
4 months ago
Francesco, I think having a paper trail is important for tracking cash transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
4 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like a lot of paperwork.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kasandra
5 months ago
I agree with Francine, option C would provide more detailed information for reporting suspicious transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
5 months ago
But completing SAR worksheets on all cash transactions of $5,000 or more would help identify suspicious activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
5 months ago
I disagree, I think option C is the way to go. Completing SAR worksheets on cash transactions of $5,000 or more is crucial for reporting any suspicious activity.
upvoted 0 times
Delmy
4 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
4 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jaime
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
6 months ago
I think option D is the most effective. Monitoring suspicious patterns, even in smaller transactions, can help catch potential money laundering activities.
upvoted 0 times
Madalyn
5 months ago
I think reviewing all deposits of $25,000 or more would also be effective in strengthening the program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
5 months ago
I agree, monitoring smaller transactions is key to catching suspicious activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francine
6 months ago
I think option C is the most effective.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77