Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APA Exam CPP-Remote Topic 9 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for APA's CPP-Remote exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 9
[All CPP-Remote Questions]

How may FIT be withheld from separation pay and accrued vacation wages totaling $20,000 that are paid at the time of termination and identified separately on the EE's pay stub, if the EE has been paid $25,000 so far this year and had income tax withheld from her most recent wage payment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tish
2 months ago
D all the way! The question doesn't specify a preference, so why not go with the option that lets you choose between two valid methods? It's like a tax choose-your-own-adventure!
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
1 months ago
B) using the prior 12 months' tax rate
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
1 months ago
D) at the optional flat rate or using the aggregate method
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
2 months ago
A) using the aggregate method only
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawnda
2 months ago
Hmm, that's interesting. Can you explain your rationale for choosing option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) at the optional flat rate or using the aggregate method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
2 months ago
I'm going with D. Giving the employer the choice between the flat rate or aggregate method seems like the most reasonable approach here. Plus, it's always good to have options when dealing with those pesky tax withholdings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. The prior 12 months' tax rate could be a simpler option, but the flexibility of D might be better. Gotta love these tricky tax questions!
upvoted 0 times
Colby
1 months ago
But B could be easier to calculate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
1 months ago
True, but D gives you more flexibility in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
2 months ago
Yeah, D seems like the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
2 months ago
I think D is the way to go. It gives you options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonio
2 months ago
D definitely sounds like the way to go. The question mentions the employee has been paid $25,000 so far this year, so the aggregate method might be the most accurate approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is D. It gives you the flexibility to use the optional flat rate or the aggregate method, which seems more practical in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Rochell
2 months ago
Using the aggregate method only might be too restrictive in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
2 months ago
I think option B could also work, depending on the specific circumstances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
2 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawnda
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) using the aggregate method only.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77