Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS Exam CPIM-MPR Topic 4 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-MPR exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 4
[All CPIM-MPR Questions]

Which of the following tradeoffs should be considered to improve the performance of a distribution network?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Francisca
2 months ago
If I had a dollar for every time I had to balance inventory and customer service, I'd be a millionaire. D is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Trinidad
2 months ago
I see your point, but C is also crucial for improving profit and reducing obsolete inventory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
2 months ago
That's true, but increasing inventory turns with option B could also be beneficial in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
2 months ago
But what about A? Full truckload shipments could also help reduce costs and improve customer service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
2 months ago
I agree, D is definitely important for balancing fill rate and inventory turns.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Milly
3 months ago
Is it just me, or does this question sound like a bad game of Tetris? Gotta fit all those tradeoffs together!
upvoted 0 times
Tyra
2 months ago
C) Improve profit but decrease inventory by not scrapping obsolete product
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
2 months ago
B) Increase inventory turns but decrease costs by shipping more frequently
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
2 months ago
A) Reduce cost but improve customer service by using full truckload or carload shipments
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Golda
3 months ago
D is the correct answer. Who wants to deal with angry customers because of low fill rates? Safety stock is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. D sounds good, but C also makes sense. Improving profit by not scrapping obsolete product could be a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
Vashti
2 months ago
Maybe a combination of both D and C could work best for the distribution network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
2 months ago
True, it's a tough decision. Both options have their benefits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
2 months ago
But C is also important. Not scrapping obsolete product can increase profit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
2 months ago
I think D is a good option. Adding safety stock can help improve fill rate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micah
3 months ago
I think option B strikes a good balance between inventory turns and costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
3 months ago
But adding safety stock can increase costs in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
3 months ago
B is the way to go! Increasing inventory turns and decreasing costs by shipping more frequently is a win-win.
upvoted 0 times
Gabriele
2 months ago
Definitely, shipping more frequently can help with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
3 months ago
I agree, increasing inventory turns is key to improving performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yen
3 months ago
I think the answer is D. Improving fill rate by adding safety stock is a great way to balance customer service and inventory costs.
upvoted 0 times
Mari
2 months ago
Yes, but it's a tradeoff to consider for better customer service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
3 months ago
But what about A? Reducing cost while improving customer service also seems like a good tradeoff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
3 months ago
I agree, D seems like the best option to balance customer service and inventory costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
3 months ago
But wouldn't that decrease inventory turns?
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
3 months ago
I agree, adding safety stock can help improve fill rate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominga
3 months ago
I think option A is the best tradeoff.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77