Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APMG-International Exam AgilePM-Practitioner Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's AgilePM-Practitioner exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All AgilePM-Practitioner Questions]

Answer the following questions about the DSDM Lifecycle.

Decide if each observation is an appropriate application of Agile Project Management for

this project and select the option that supports your decision.

When the project was in the Feasibility phase it was initially proposed by the Finance

Manager that it was a fixed price for a fixed specification' project. The Project Manager

has decided that the best way to tackle it would be to leave the development of the least

valuable features of the product until last.

Is this an appropriate application of the DSDM lifecycle?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Miesha
2 months ago
Option A sounds good, but I'm not sure the Finance Manager's idea of 'fixed price for fixed specification' is very Agile. I'll go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
2 months ago
Haha, this question reminds me of that time my boss tried to tell me how to do my job. Option C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
Deandrea
28 days ago
Definitely, it's all about collaboration and letting the experts do their job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
1 months ago
I agree, it's important for the team to make those decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 months ago
Option C) No, because the Solution Development Team should decide which features are left until last.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joanna
2 months ago
I disagree. Option C is the right answer. The Solution Development Team should decide which features are left until last, not the Project Manager.
upvoted 0 times
Theodora
2 months ago
I disagree. Option C is the right answer. The Solution Development Team should decide which features are left until last, not the Project Manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
2 months ago
I agree with you. Option A seems like the most appropriate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
2 months ago
I think option A is correct. The later parts of the project should reflect the least valuable features.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Matthew
2 months ago
But doesn't it make sense to leave the least valuable features until last?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
3 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
3 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. In DSDM, there is no detailed specification upfront, so leaving the least valuable features until last makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
Audrie
2 months ago
Definitely, in DSDM projects, not having a detailed specification upfront allows for flexibility in prioritizing features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
3 months ago
I agree, option B is the best choice for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77