Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APMG-International Exam AgilePM-Practitioner Topic 4 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's AgilePM-Practitioner exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 4
[All AgilePM-Practitioner Questions]

Which 2 actions should the Team Leader take to implement the new Must

Have requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Louisa
4 months ago
B and C are the way to go. Gotta make sure the Timebox and dependencies are all sorted out before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
3 months ago
C) Discuss the development interfaces and dependencies with the Solution Development Team to ensure the associated Timebox is appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
4 months ago
B) Add the additional tasks required to create the financial transaction functionality to the Timebox Plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melvin
4 months ago
Hey, at least they didn't ask us to 'source and hire a web developer with experience in developing online financial transaction functionality.' That would be way too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
4 months ago
Consolidating the agenda might be a good first step, but I think B and C are the most important actions to take. Can't forget the financial transaction functionality!
upvoted 0 times
Trinidad
3 months ago
Consolidating the agenda is important, but focusing on the financial transaction functionality is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
Yes, those actions will ensure the new Must Have requirement is implemented successfully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
4 months ago
I agree, adding the additional tasks and discussing development interfaces are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malinda
5 months ago
I think we should also consider de-scoping Should Have and/or Could Have requirements to make room for the new Must Have functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
Discussing development interfaces with the Solution Development Team is important to ensure the Timebox is appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
5 months ago
I agree with Devorah. Adding the additional tasks to the Timebox Plan is also crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
5 months ago
I would go with B and D. Adding the tasks to the Timebox is a must, and we'll need to de-scope some lower-priority requirements to make room for the new one.
upvoted 0 times
Glenn
4 months ago
That's a good point. Let's focus on what's most important for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
4 months ago
We might have to de-scope some lower-priority requirements to make it work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
5 months ago
Agree, that's a priority. We can't miss that deadline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
5 months ago
I think we should definitely add the tasks to the Timebox plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Phuong
5 months ago
B and C seem like the most logical steps to me. Adding the new tasks to the Timebox Plan and discussing the development interfaces with the team are key to implementing the new requirement effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Nakisha
4 months ago
Yes, and we also need to discuss the development interfaces with the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
4 months ago
I think we should add the new tasks to the Timebox Plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devorah
5 months ago
I think the Team Leader should consolidate and circulate an agenda for the workshop.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77