Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education Exam S90.05A Topic 2 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.05A exam

Question #: 46
Topic #: 2

[All S90.05A Questions]

You have created an XML schema for a Purchase Order service. The schema, named "po.xsd", is as follows:

Because you believe this schema will need to also be used in several different services, you decide to separate it from the WSDL definition by placing it into its own XML Schema definition. As a result, you now need to import the XML schema into the WSDL document. Which of the following code fragments shows a valid way to import the schema shown above into a WSDL "types" element?

AOption A

BOption B

COption C

DOption D

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Alethea at Jun 24, 2024, 05:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.05A Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Gaynell

5 months ago

Ah, the age-old debate of XML vs. JSON. But let's focus - I think Option B is the most straightforward way to import the schema.

upvoted 0 times

Casey

4 months ago

Let's go with Option B then, it seems like the most straightforward way.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hailey

4 months ago

I'm not sure, but I trust your judgment on Option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonja

4 months ago

I think Option A could also work, but Option B seems simpler.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyisha

4 months ago

I agree, Option B looks like the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Lavonna

5 months ago

Option B uses the correct syntax for importing the schema into the WSDL document.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linwood

5 months ago

Haha, who needs XML schemas when you can just use JSON? But for this question, I'd say Option B is the winner.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruthann

5 months ago

Option D is the way to go. The schema location should be specified using a relative path, not a full URL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

5 months ago

Why do you think Option B is correct?

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards Option C. The targetNamespace attribute in the schema should be used in the import statement.

upvoted 0 times

Mari

5 months ago

I agree, Option C is the way to go. It's important to use the targetNamespace attribute in the import statement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

5 months ago

I think Option C is correct. The targetNamespace attribute is important for importing the schema.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Lavonna

5 months ago

I disagree, I believe Option B is the correct way to import the schema.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

6 months ago

I think the correct answer is Option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaycee

6 months ago

Option B looks good to me. The namespace and schemaLocation attributes seem to match the schema definition.

upvoted 0 times

Rozella

5 months ago

I agree, the namespace and schemaLocation attributes match the schema definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colby

5 months ago

I think Option B is the correct choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77