Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education Exam S90.05A Topic 3 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.05A exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 3
[All S90.05A Questions]

You are asked to create an XML schema for an Address Formatting service that needs to be able to accept a mailing address and then return the same address rearranged in a different format defined by the postal service. You are given the following specific instructions as to how the XML schema should be designed:

* The XML schema requires two elements named "AddressLookup" and "AddressResponse".

* The "AddressLookup" element must contain child elements named "address1", "address21" "city". "stateOrRegion", "postalCode" "country", in that order. Each of these elements must have the type string.

* The "AddressResponse" has the same children as the "AddressLookup" message, plus it contains an "addressValid" element as its last child. This element is added to indicate whether a valid address was found, and therefore this element must be of type Boolean.

Which of the following XML schemas fulfills the requirements while also following the instructions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Winfred
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Option C might be the best option because it looks more organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
3 months ago
I believe Option B is the correct choice because it includes the 'addressValid' element as specified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
3 months ago
Definitely Option B. Any other choice would be as foolish as wearing socks with sandals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
3 months ago
Option B is the bomb! It's the XML schema equivalent of a drop-top Lamborghini.
upvoted 0 times
Kattie
3 months ago
Option B it is then. Let's go with the drop-top Lamborghini of XML schemas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
3 months ago
I agree, Option B seems to meet all the requirements perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
3 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go. It's sleek and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Johana
4 months ago
I agree with Bo, Option A seems to follow the instructions correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
4 months ago
I think Option A fulfills the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
4 months ago
I'll have to go with Option B as well. Can't argue with the clear instructions provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
4 months ago
I agree, Option B is the way to go. The schema is structured just as it should be.
upvoted 0 times
Corrinne
3 months ago
Option B seems to be the most suitable. It meets all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
4 months ago
I also think Option B is the best choice. It follows the instructions perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louvenia
4 months ago
Option B looks like the correct answer here. It follows the exact requirements laid out in the instructions.
upvoted 0 times
Sabra
4 months ago
I think we can confidently go with Option B for the Address Formatting service XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
4 months ago
Option B is definitely the one that meets all the specified requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
4 months ago
I agree, Option B seems to be the best choice for the XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77