Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education Exam S90.05A Topic 5 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.05A exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 5
[All S90.05A Questions]

You have created the following XML Schema definition for a new Invoice Reporting service:

The Invoice Reporting service needs to represent invoice data in a unique format. Therefore, this schema will only be used by the WSDL definition for the Invoice Reporting service. As a result, you decide to embed the schema inside the WSDL definition. Which of the following shows a valid way to accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Herman
2 months ago
Option B, no doubt. Gotta keep that invoice data nice and snug inside the WSDL. Plus, it'll really impress the HR folks when they see how efficiently you handled this schema situation.
upvoted 0 times
Casey
1 months ago
User4: Agreed, it's the most efficient way to handle the schema for the Invoice Reporting service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
1 months ago
Option B it is then, let's keep that invoice data secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
1 months ago
Yeah, embedding the schema inside the WSDL is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harley
2 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerardo
3 months ago
Wow, these options are all over the place. I'm just going to go with Option B and call it a day. Embedding the schema is the most straightforward approach, and who doesn't love a good embedded schema?
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
2 months ago
Agreed, let's go with Option B and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
2 months ago
Yeah, embedding the schema seems like the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
2 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalia
3 months ago
Hold up, are we sure we even need to embed the schema? Option D might be the simplest solution, just include it as an import. Less complexity is always better, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Tora
2 months ago
Exactly, it all depends on the specific requirements of the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
2 months ago
True, in that case, embedding it might be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
2 months ago
But what if we need to ensure the schema is only used by the WSDL definition?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
2 months ago
I think Option D is the way to go, keeping it simple is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
3 months ago
Option C embeds the schema inside the WSDL definition, which is what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
3 months ago
Why do you think Option C is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
3 months ago
I'm not sure why they would choose to embed the schema. Wouldn't it be better to keep it separate and referenced? Option C seems more standard to me.
upvoted 0 times
Julieta
2 months ago
I agree, but keeping it separate and referenced could also be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
3 months ago
I think embedding the schema in the WSDL definition can make it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
3 months ago
Option B looks like the way to go. Embedding the schema inside the WSDL definition seems like the best approach for this specialized invoice service.
upvoted 0 times
Ammie
3 months ago
Embedding the schema inside the WSDL definition with Option B seems like the most appropriate approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
3 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go for this specialized invoice service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
3 months ago
I agree, Option B is the best choice for embedding the schema inside the WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77