Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education Exam S90.18 Topic 5 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.18 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 5
[All S90.18 Questions]

Which of the following approaches represents a valid means of utilizing generic security logic?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alpha
4 months ago
I personally think option D is the way to go, as it combines the benefits of both A and C for maximum security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
4 months ago
That's a good point, option C does offer more flexibility in terms of when the security logic is executed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
4 months ago
All of the above? What is this, a buffet? I'm going with option B. Keep it simple, keep it secure.
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
2 months ago
I'm going to stick with option B. Keeping it simple and secure sounds good to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
2 months ago
I'm with User2 on this one. Option A it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
2 months ago
I agree with User1. Option A seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
3 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. Embedding security logic within the service makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marica
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the most effective as it allows for reuse and execution in response to runtime events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option C. Having the security logic in a service agent that can respond to runtime events sounds pretty slick.
upvoted 0 times
Ezekiel
3 months ago
Yeah, it definitely allows for reuse and can respond quickly to runtime events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
4 months ago
I agree, having the security logic in a service agent seems like a flexible approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leatha
4 months ago
Option D, huh? Trying to cover all the bases, eh? Might as well throw in a dancing security guard for good measure.
upvoted 0 times
Halina
3 months ago
C) When required, generic security logic can be abstracted into a service agent. This allows for reuse and the security logic can be executed in response to runtime events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
3 months ago
B) When required, generic security logic can be abstracted into a separate utility service. This allows for reuse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
4 months ago
A) When required, generic security logic can be embedded within a service. The close proximity to the service logic maximizes the chances that the security logic will be consistently executed without interference from attackers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerald
4 months ago
I think option A is the best approach because embedding security logic within a service ensures consistent execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
4 months ago
Option B seems the most logical choice. Separating the security logic into a reusable utility service makes a lot of sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Rickie
3 months ago
Having a service agent for security logic execution based on runtime events sounds efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
3 months ago
It definitely makes sense to abstract security logic for reuse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
3 months ago
I think having a separate utility service for security logic is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
4 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like a practical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77