Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASQ Exam CSQE Topic 7 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CSQE exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 7
[All CSQE Questions]

During concurrent development., a user reported a problem with Version 1 of the software product. A software quality engineer determined the problem originated m Version 2 of the product. Which of the following actions would be most appropriate for the software quality engineer to take first to fix the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

In a concurrent development environment, when a problem is identified in an earlier version (Version 1) that originated in a later version (Version 2), the appropriate action involves managing the code versions effectively. Branching the Version 2 codeline is the most appropriate first step because:

Isolation of Changes: Branching allows for the isolation of the problematic code in Version 2, enabling targeted fixes without affecting ongoing development in other versions.

Concurrent Development: This approach supports concurrent development activities, allowing different teams to work on fixing the issue in Version 2 while continuing development on other versions.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Alonzo
1 days ago
Merging the fix into Version 3 could work, but it might introduce additional issues. Better to focus on the root cause in Version 2 first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
2 days ago
I think adding new functionality to Version 2 could potentially introduce more issues, so I would go with branching as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
11 days ago
I agree with Marge, branching Version 2 would allow for a more targeted fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
13 days ago
I disagree, I believe branching the Version 2 codeline would be more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
16 days ago
I think the software quality engineer should merge the fix into Version 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
24 days ago
I agree with Lucy. Branching the Version 2 codeline is the best approach to address the problem without impacting the ongoing development of Version 3.
upvoted 0 times
An
3 days ago
B) Branch the Version 2 codeline
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
14 days ago
A) Merge the fix into Version 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lucy
29 days ago
Branching the Version 2 codeline seems like the most logical first step to fix the problem. This way, the engineer can isolate the issue and work on a fix without disrupting the main development process.
upvoted 0 times
Tasia
22 days ago
A) Merge the fix into Version 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
22 days ago
B) Branch the Version 2 codeline
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77