Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASTQB Exam ASTQB Topic 4 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's ASTQB exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 4
[All ASTQB Questions]

Which type of application is more portable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cherrie
3 months ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I'm going to go with my gut and choose C. Both types have their pros and cons when it comes to portability.
upvoted 0 times
Dorcas
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe hybrid mobile applications are more portable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
3 months ago
I think native mobile applications are more portable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenna
3 months ago
Hybrid apps are the future! Portability and cross-platform compatibility are their biggest advantages. B is the correct answer, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
3 months ago
I think the question is a bit misleading. Portability depends on the specific implementation, not the app type. Let's move on to the next one.
upvoted 0 times
Cherrie
2 months ago
Let's move on to the next question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
3 months ago
Yeah, portability really depends on how the app is implemented.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
3 months ago
I agree, the question is not clear. Let's skip to the next one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rhea
4 months ago
I agree with Natalya, both native and hybrid applications are easily portable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
C'mon, guys! Both options are portable. This question is just trying to trick us. I'll go with D.
upvoted 0 times
Loreta
3 months ago
Definitely, D is the correct choice. Both types of applications are easily portable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
3 months ago
I agree, both options are portable. Let's go with D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
3 months ago
D) Both are easily portable
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
3 months ago
C) Both are not portable
upvoted 0 times
...
James
3 months ago
B) Hybrid mobile application
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
4 months ago
A) Native mobile application
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalya
4 months ago
I think both are easily portable because they can be used on multiple platforms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe native mobile applications are more portable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
4 months ago
Option A is the way to go. Native apps may have limited portability, but they offer better performance and user experience.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
3 months ago
D) Both are easily portable
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
4 months ago
I agree, native apps may not be as portable but they definitely offer better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
4 months ago
A) Native mobile application
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryann
4 months ago
I'm going with option B. Hybrid apps are more portable since they can run on multiple platforms.
upvoted 0 times
Aide
3 months ago
It's true, hybrid apps can be easily adapted to different operating systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
3 months ago
Hybrid apps are a great choice for reaching a wider audience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
3 months ago
I think native apps are more limited in terms of portability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
4 months ago
I agree with you, hybrid apps are definitely more portable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hubert
4 months ago
I think hybrid mobile applications are more portable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77