Axis Exam ANVE Topic 5 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Axis's ANVE exam

Question #: 98
Topic #: 5

[All ANVE Questions]

In good conditions, a pixel density of 250 px/m (80 px/ft) is required for

Arecognition.

Bidentification.

Cdetection.

Dobservation.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

In good conditions, a pixel density of 250 px/m (80 px/ft) is required for identification purposes. This means that at this resolution, the image quality is sufficient to identify individuals, objects, or other details accurately. Identification requires the highest level of detail among the common surveillance objectives (detection, observation, recognition, identification). This pixel density allows for clear and precise visual information necessary for identifying specific features such as facial characteristics or license plates.

by Beckie at Sep 14, 2024, 07:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANVE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Britt

2 months ago

This is a no-brainer, it's clearly B) identification. Unless you're trying to read someone's mind through the screen, that is.

upvoted 0 times

...

Man

2 months ago

Gotta be C) detection. I don't need 250 px/m to recognize a picture of my cat, that's overkill!

upvoted 0 times

Ammie

28 days ago

I would go with C) detection as well, it seems like the best fit for the pixel density mentioned.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristian

1 months ago

Yeah, I think C) detection makes the most sense in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mickie

1 months ago

I agree, C) detection seems like the most appropriate option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celia

2 months ago

I'm going with B) identification. Anything less and you'd be squinting at the screen trying to make out the details.

upvoted 0 times

Nakisha

1 months ago

I also think B) identification is the right choice for that pixel density.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

2 months ago

Yeah, I think B) identification makes the most sense for clear details on the screen.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlee

2 months ago

I agree, B) identification is definitely the best option for that pixel density.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyndia

2 months ago

But don't you think that in good conditions, a higher pixel density would be needed for identification rather than recognition?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gussie

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is A) recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyndia

2 months ago

I think the answer is B) identification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thersa

2 months ago

Hmm, C) detection sounds right to me. That level of detail seems more for identifying specific objects than just general recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

2 months ago

D) observation, definitely. I mean, who needs that kind of pixel density to just detect something?

upvoted 0 times

Gilma

30 days ago

D) observation, definitely. I mean, who needs that kind of pixel density to just detect something?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ora

1 months ago

C) detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

1 months ago

B) identification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Xochitl

1 months ago

A) recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

2 months ago

C) detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanda

2 months ago

B) identification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shala

2 months ago

A) recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Germaine

3 months ago

I think it's B) identification. Seems like a pretty high pixel density for just recognition.

upvoted 0 times

Laurel

2 months ago

I think D) observation makes sense too, as it would need a high pixel density for detailed viewing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mattie

2 months ago

I would go with C) detection, as it requires a higher pixel density for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louann

2 months ago

I agree, it does seem high for just recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Toshia

2 months ago

I think it's B) identification. Seems like a pretty high pixel density for just recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...