Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BACB Exam BCBA Topic 1 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for BACB's BCBA exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 1
[All BCBA Questions]

The use of an alternating treatments design should be considered iF:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Curtis
4 months ago
D all the way! Can't have those pesky interventions interfering with each other, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Genevive
3 months ago
B) one needs to evaluate the effects of a single intervention across multiple settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
3 months ago
Exactly! It's important to consider how interventions might interact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
3 months ago
D) there is the possibility that the effect of one intervention will influence the effect of another.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
3 months ago
A) it is important that multiple interventions be evaluated quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gladys
4 months ago
I'm going with C. If the reversal designs are ambiguous, an alternating treatments design could be a better option.
upvoted 0 times
Rossana
3 months ago
That makes sense. It's a good way to see if one intervention is more effective than another.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
4 months ago
C) the results of multiple reversal designs are ambiguous.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kyoko
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Is there a trick question hidden in there somewhere? This seems too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
4 months ago
B looks good to me. Evaluating a single intervention across multiple settings is exactly what an alternating treatments design is for.
upvoted 0 times
Alesia
4 months ago
I think B is the most suitable option for considering an alternating treatments design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
4 months ago
That makes sense, B is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
4 months ago
It's definitely important to evaluate the effects of a single intervention across multiple settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
4 months ago
I agree, B is the correct option for using an alternating treatments design.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marya
4 months ago
I think it ultimately depends on the specific research question and design of the study.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
4 months ago
That's true, Louis. It can be useful in that scenario as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
5 months ago
I think the answer is D. If there's a possibility that one intervention could influence another, an alternating treatments design would help tease that out.
upvoted 0 times
Amina
4 months ago
D) there is the possibility that the effect of one intervention will influence the effect of another.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
5 months ago
A) it is important that multiple interventions be evaluated quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louis
5 months ago
But what about evaluating the effects of a single intervention across multiple settings? Isn't that also a valid reason to use alternating treatments design?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
5 months ago
I agree with Deja. It can help clarify the effects of interventions when the results are unclear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
5 months ago
I think the use of an alternating treatments design should be considered if the results of multiple reversal designs are ambiguous.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77