BACB Exam BCBA Topic 4 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for BACB's BCBA exam

Question #: 91
Topic #: 4

[All BCBA Questions]

The use of an alternating treatments design should be considered iF:

Ait is important that multiple interventions be evaluated quickly.

Bone needs to evaluate the effects of a single intervention across multiple settings.

Cthe results of multiple reversal designs are ambiguous.

Dthere is the possibility that the effect of one intervention will influence the effect of another.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Niesha at Jul 05, 2024, 07:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium BCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Olen

4 months ago

I'm just gonna go with C. Reversal designs? More like reversal nightmares, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Johnna

3 months ago

I prefer using alternating treatments design for quick evaluation of interventions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keshia

3 months ago

Yeah, it's important to consider different research designs for accurate evaluations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carolann

3 months ago

I think alternating treatments design can help clarify ambiguous results.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josphine

4 months ago

I agree, reversal designs can be tricky to interpret.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thomasena

5 months ago

I think it's crucial to consider alternating treatments design when multiple interventions need to be evaluated quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bulah

5 months ago

I believe alternating treatments design is also useful when there is a possibility that the effect of one intervention will influence the effect of another.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leana

5 months ago

I agree with Aileen. It's important to have a clear method to evaluate interventions when the results are unclear.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oretha

5 months ago

Haha, option C? Reversal designs? What is this, the 80s? Go with the alternating treatments, my friend.

upvoted 0 times

Danilo

3 months ago

Definitely, no need to stick with old methods when there are more efficient options available.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rhea

3 months ago

I agree, alternating treatments design allows for quick evaluation of multiple interventions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleshia

4 months ago

Yeah, option C seems outdated. Alternating treatments design is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonne

4 months ago

Definitely, alternating treatments design is more efficient than relying on reversal designs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cheryl

4 months ago

I agree, we need to consider using alternating treatments for quick evaluation of multiple interventions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

4 months ago

Yeah, option C seems outdated. Alternating treatments design is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teddy

5 months ago

Ooh, option B sounds like a good way to get a well-rounded evaluation. Gotta try it in all the settings!

upvoted 0 times

Charolette

4 months ago

Yeah, it can give a more comprehensive understanding of its effectiveness.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gabriele

4 months ago

I agree, it's important to see how the intervention works in different settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

5 months ago

I think the use of an alternating treatments design should be considered if the results of multiple reversal designs are ambiguous.

upvoted 0 times

...

Weldon

5 months ago

Hold on, isn't option D the correct one? Can't have those pesky intervention effects influencing each other.

upvoted 0 times

Dalene

4 months ago

I see, so option D is the best choice to consider when using an alternating treatments design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettye

5 months ago

That's true, but in this case, option D is more relevant to avoid any potential confounding effects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ammie

5 months ago

But what about option A? It's also important to evaluate multiple interventions quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

5 months ago

Yes, option D is correct. We want to avoid any interference between interventions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alecia

5 months ago

Definitely option A. I need to evaluate those interventions pronto!

upvoted 0 times

Timothy

5 months ago

I agree, we don't have time to waste. Let's get started with the alternating treatments design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herman

5 months ago

Option A is definitely the way to go. We need to evaluate those interventions quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...