Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BACB Exam BCBA Topic 5 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for BACB's BCBA exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 5
[All BCBA Questions]

To address hitting others, two procedures were compareD. differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior and time-out. The outcomes were examined within and across subjects. A withdrawal design was employed. The BEST response measure to use in this study is frequency oF.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rana
2 months ago
Wait, wait, wait... 'frequency of the incompatible behavior'? What is this, a secret code for 'frequency of sneezing while juggling chainsaws'? I'm going with C, just because it's the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 months ago
Hmm, I think 'frequency of reinforcer delivery' might be the way to go. After all, we're talking about differential reinforcement, so that's gotta be important, right? Although, I do like the idea of 'frequency of being sent to time-out' - that's got a certain comedic flair to it.
upvoted 0 times
Lonny
25 days ago
I see your point, but I still think measuring the frequency of being sent to time-out could provide valuable information on the effectiveness of the time-out procedure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
1 months ago
D) reinforcer delivery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
1 months ago
C) hitting others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
2 months ago
I think focusing on the frequency of hitting others would also be important to see if the behavior is decreasing over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
2 months ago
I agree, measuring the frequency of reinforcer delivery would give us a good idea of how effective the differential reinforcement is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
2 months ago
B) being sent to time-out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
2 months ago
A) the incompatible behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chauncey
3 months ago
I dunno, I'm kind of leaning towards 'frequency of hitting others.' I mean, that's the behavior they're trying to address, so that seems like the obvious choice.
upvoted 0 times
Coletta
2 months ago
C) hitting others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
2 months ago
B) being sent to time-out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
2 months ago
A) the incompatible behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
3 months ago
I think measuring the frequency of hitting others could be biased, as it may not capture all instances. Measuring the incompatible behavior might be more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
3 months ago
But wouldn't measuring hitting others directly give us a clearer picture of the effectiveness of the procedures?
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the best measure would be frequency of the incompatible behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
3 months ago
Clearly, the best response measure is the frequency of the incompatible behavior. That's the whole point of the study, right? The title is a dead giveaway.
upvoted 0 times
Billye
2 months ago
B) being sent to time-out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
2 months ago
A) the incompatible behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tien
3 months ago
I think the best response measure would be frequency of hitting others.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77