Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam BAPv5 Topic 3 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's BAPv5 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 3
[All BAPv5 Questions]

End users in one business area are unwilling to adopt a new finance management system (recently introduced by the innovation team), as they perceive that it is unnecessarily complicated and not useful. One of the end users in this business area has been very vocal and has been relying support from others since posting about it on the company's intranet homepage.

The introduction finance system was initially supported by senior managers, but now users in other business area are also beginning to question whether they adopt the tool and are raising the issue with their managers.

The sponsor fully supports the decision to go ahead with the now tool and has made il very cleat to senior managers that he expects them to support this Initiative.

Which stakeholder management strategy SHOULD be taken with the senior managers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The stakeholder management strategy for senior managers should be constant active management. Senior managers have high power and high interest in the project, as they are responsible for overseeing its implementation and ensuring its alignment with organizational goals. They also have influence over other stakeholders, such as end users and employees. Therefore, they need to be regularly engaged, consulted, informed, and involved in decision making throughout the project lifecycle. Option B is the correct answer.


Stakeholder Analysis using the Power Interest Grid - ProjectManagement.com

Power Interest Grid: How to Use, Benefits, Examples - KnowledgeHut

Contribute your Thoughts:

Heidy
5 months ago
Haha, looks like the sponsor is really cracking the whip on this one! I'd go with B. Constant active management, just to be safe. Don't want any mutiny on the finance ship!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. Maybe a mix of constant active management and keeping them informed would work best. Gotta keep those senior managers happy, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Viva
4 months ago
B) Constant active management
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
4 months ago
A) Keep onside.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashlee
5 months ago
I think D. Keep informed is the best approach. No need to micromanage them, just keep them in the loop on the progress and any issues that arise.
upvoted 0 times
Theron
4 months ago
D) Keep informed
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
4 months ago
C) Watch
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
4 months ago
B) Constant active management
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
5 months ago
A) Keep onside.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marvel
5 months ago
Option B. Constant active management is the way to go. We need to keep those senior managers engaged and on board with this initiative.
upvoted 0 times
Nydia
4 months ago
B) Constant active management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
5 months ago
A) Keep onside.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Harris
5 months ago
I personally think option A) Keep onside is the best approach. We need to make sure the senior managers are fully on board with the decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
6 months ago
I think option D) Keep informed could also be a good strategy. Keeping them updated on the progress could help maintain their support.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
6 months ago
I agree with Casie. It's important to actively manage the senior managers to ensure their support.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
6 months ago
I think we should go with option B) Constant active management.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77