Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam TM12 Topic 6 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TM12 exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 6
[All TM12 Questions]

You are estimating the effort for the integration testing activities of a new project. Consider the following factors, which can affect that estimation:

Availability of re-usable test systems and documentation from previous, similar projects

Unexpected timing of components arrival

Stability of the integration test team (no turnover)

Many and geographically distributed sub-teams

Which of the following statements is true?

Number of correct responses: 1

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jenifer
2 months ago
Option D, for sure. I mean, who needs stability and reusable test systems when you can have a bunch of geographically distributed sub-teams? That's the recipe for a successful project, right?
upvoted 0 times
Kattie
1 months ago
I guess having many sub-teams can bring in diverse perspectives and ideas, but stability and reusability are important for consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 months ago
Exactly! Stability and reusable test systems are overrated. Geographically distributed sub-teams are where it's at.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
D) III. and IV. can negatively affect the estimationI. and II. usually favor the accuracy of the estimation effort
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marlon
2 months ago
So, the correct answer must include option III. and IV.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
2 months ago
I agree, turnover can really disrupt the testing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between options A and C. Guess I'll have to flip a coin on this one. Or maybe I should just ask the Magic 8 Ball for the answer.
upvoted 0 times
Melodie
2 months ago
Maybe you should consider the stability of the integration test team in your decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C, as factors II and IV can negatively affect the estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
2 months ago
I agree, factors III and IV usually favor the accuracy of the estimation effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
2 months ago
I think option A is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Matthew
3 months ago
Option A seems like the correct answer. Factors like availability of reusable test systems and stable integration test team definitely help with the accuracy of the estimation effort.
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
2 months ago
Yes, unexpected timing of components arrival and geographically distributed sub-teams can definitely throw off the estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
3 months ago
I agree, having re-usable test systems and a stable team can really make a difference in estimation accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joesph
3 months ago
I'm going with option B. Unexpected timing of component arrivals and geographic distribution of sub-teams can definitely throw a wrench in the estimation process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
3 months ago
I think stability of the integration test team is important for accurate estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77