Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BICSI Exam RCDDv14.1 Topic 4 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for BICSI's RCDDv14.1 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 4
[All RCDDv14.1 Questions]

What is the MINIMUM lighting requirement for telecommunications spaces?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Chau
2 days ago
As an electrician, I can tell you that A is way too dim. You need that space well-lit for troubleshooting and maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
5 days ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is a lighting enthusiast. 'Foot-candles' - who uses that unit these days?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
7 days ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. Both have high lux levels, but D might be overkill. I'll have to think this one through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
10 days ago
D is definitely the way to go. Symmetry between the horizontal and vertical planes is important for optimal lighting in these areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
19 days ago
I remember reading that the correct answer is D) 500 lux in both the horizontal and vertical planes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
28 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) 500 lux in the horizontal plane and 200 lux in the vertical plane makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is B) 200 lux in the horizontal plane and 500 lux in the vertical plane.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 months ago
I think the minimum lighting requirement is A) 50 lux in the horizontal plane and 20 lux in the vertical plane.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
1 months ago
Option A seems a bit too low for a telecommunications space. I'd go with something a little brighter to ensure good visibility.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
15 days ago
Yeah, I agree. Option B provides a higher level of lighting which would be more suitable for a telecommunications space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
18 days ago
I agree, option A does seem a bit low. I think we should go with option B for better visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77